Case Summary
Beena S.H. is the complainant, and Sree Lekshmi is the accused. The case involves an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant was absent, and the matter was settled. The accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The matter was settled and the accused was acquitted.
The matter was settled and the accused was acquitted.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The matter settled. Filed withdrawal petition. CMP 15/2025 allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced in the open court on this the 27th day of March, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Beena S.H.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sree Lekshmi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Thevally K.S. Rajiv
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Kankath G. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Withdrawal petition filed and accused acquitted.
Evidence:
Filed withdrawal petition. CMP 15/2025 allowed. Accused acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Beena S.H. vs Sree Lekshmi regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Beena S.H. vs Sree Lekshmi regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act