Case Summary
Raju Lawrance is the complainant and Mrs. Saphy V.R. is the accused in this case under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant sought a remedy for a cheque bounce issue.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The accused was acquitted under section 257 of the Cr.P.C. due to the withdrawal petition filed by the complainant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The accused acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raju Lawrance
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Saphy V.R.
- Relation
- W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Withdrawal petition filed.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M.P. Sugathan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Sajeev Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Accused acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Raju Lawrance vs Mrs. Saphy V.R. regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Raju Lawrance vs Mrs. Saphy V.R. regarding U/s. 138 N.I. Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act