Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 217/2025

Case between Anil.B vs Prathap.R.S regarding conditional attachment before judgment

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
approximately-10 months 21 days
Case Code No.
217
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anil.B filed a petition for conditional attachment against Prathap.R.S due to non-payment of a cheque amounting to Rs.7 lakhs. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay despite multiple agreements and promises.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the IA filed by the plaintiff for conditional attachment before judgment, lifting the attachment over the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the IA filed by the plaintiff for conditional attachment before judgment, lifting the attachment over the property in question.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to an order in his favour as the financial obligations were substantially discharged by the defendant.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to an order in his favour as the financial obligations were substantially discharged by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
Thus, it can be concluded that the plaintiff is not entitled to get an order in his favour. Thus, the point is found against the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA dismissed with costs. Needless, to say the attachment over the plaint schedule property is hereby lifted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil.B
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prathap.R.S.
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Cheque No. 430012 of SBI, Anandavalleeswaram Branch, Dishonour Memo, Copy of Demand Notice, Postal Receipt, Acknowledgment Card, Reply Notice.
Defendants Documents
Copy of Agreement, Accounts statement from 01-08-2024 to 30-11-2024, Acknowledgment/Receipt for online Token Registration issued from SRO, Kottiyam, Copy of Complaint given to Kottiyam Police Station, Copy of Grievous Petition given to District Police Commissioner, Reply notice, Demand and Disconnection notice issued from Kerala Water Authority, Kottiyam Section, Original Pen drive, Certificate u/s.63(4)(c) of the Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kishore.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Radhakrishnan.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Conditional Attachment
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought an order for conditional attachment before judgment.
Evidence:
Thus, the point is found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant for an amount of Rs.7 lakhs and was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Dishonour memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the plaintiff to demand payment of the dishonoured cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card is an acknowledgment of receipt of the demand notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice contains the defendant's response to the plaintiff's demand.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document details the settlement between the parties regarding the payment and obligations.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Accounts statement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This statement shows the amount transferred to the plaintiff's account.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Copy of complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the grievance filed against the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Copy of Grievous Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is related to the complaint made to the District Police Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This certificate is issued under section 63(4)(c) of the Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.
Reference:
Ext.B9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Anil Kumar. B vs K.S. Baiju regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between B. Chandran vs Shylaja regarding realisation of money
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Suseela vs Sreelatha regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Suja.T.S. vs Babudas regarding Realisation of Money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chandrababu.S vs Shobha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won