Similar Cases
Based on: OS. 217/2025 — Case between Anil.B vs Prathap.R.S regarding conditional attachment before judgment
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No. 174/2018
Case between Chandrababu.S vs Shobha.S et al regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff Chandrababu.S filed a suit against the defendants Shobha.S and Sajeev.N for the realization of money. The defendants allegedly issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.698/2018
Case between Suja.T.S. vs Babudas regarding Realisation of Money.
The plaintiff, Suja.T.S., has filed a suit against the defendant, Babudas, for the recovery of Rs. 7,60,000/- which includes the amount borrowed and interest due to a dishonoured cheque. The case revolves around the loan amount and the circumstances of the cheque's issuance.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 414/2024
Case between Suseela vs Sreelatha regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, Suseela, has filed a suit against the defendant, Sreelatha, for the realization of money lent. The case revolves around a dishonoured cheque issued by the defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.186/2021
Case between B. Chandran vs Shylaja regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, B. Chandran, is seeking to recover an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs from the defendant, Shylaja, following the dishonor of a cheque issued by the defendant. The case involves claims of non-payment despite multiple requests and a legal notice being sent to the defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 708/2019
Case between Anil Kumar. B vs K.S. Baiju regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Anil Kumar. B, sold 47 pigs to the defendant, K.S. Baiju, for a total of Rs. 3,00,000 and received a post-dated cheque which was later dishonored due to insufficient funds. The case revolves around the recovery of the cheque amount along with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.465/2021
Case between Baby Xavier vs Jose Mon regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Baby Xavier, is seeking to recover a loan of ₹2,50,000 from the defendant, Jose Mon, who has allegedly failed to repay it. The plaintiff claims the loan was issued on 15.01.2021 and was backed by a cheque that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 45/2021
Case between Simi P vs Shibi P regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, Simi P, is suing her elder sister, Shibi P, seeking to recover an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- owed under a cheque that was dishonoured. The defendant claims no enforceable debt exists due to the circumstances of the cheque issuance.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 689/2023
Case between Rajesh Mohan vs Jyothikumar regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, Rajesh Mohan, has filed a suit against the defendant, Jyothikumar, to recover Rs. 5,00,000/- which was borrowed on 19/04/2023 and secured by a cheque that was dishonoured. The defendant did not repay the amount despite receiving a legal notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 171/2024
Case between R.Ashtaman vs Nidhin Kumar @ Kallada Nidhin Kumar regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff, R.Ashtaman, claims that the defendant, Nidhin Kumar, borrowed money for a job assurance and failed to repay it. The defendant provided a dishonored cheque as repayment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 977/2023
Case between Joseph Nocholas vs Jayan et al regarding Realisation of Money
Joseph Nocholas filed a suit against Jayan and his wife Vishnu Priya for the recovery of Rs. 2,75,000 that was borrowed but not repaid. The defendants issued a cheque that was dishonoured due to a closed account.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 220/2020
Case between K.N. Mohanan vs M/s.Sree Narayana constructions (Pvt.) Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
The plaintiff, K.N. Mohanan, a licensed contractor, is seeking to recover an amount of ₹10,00,000 from the defendants. The claim arises from a borrowed sum that was supposed to be repaid but remained outstanding after the cheque was dishonoured.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1007/2023
Case between Arun Raj.N. vs Murukeshan regarding Realisation of Money
Arun Raj.N. filed a suit against Murukeshan for the realization of money owed. The defendant borrowed Rs. 3,50,000/- and issued a cheque which was later dishonoured.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.629/2024
Case between G. Gopakumar vs Nijad Nissam regarding Realisation of Money
G. Gopakumar is the plaintiff who has filed a suit against Nijad Nissam for the recovery of a loan. The defendant borrowed Rs. 60,000 from the plaintiff and failed to repay the amount despite receiving legal notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 566/2018
Case between Bindhu P.S vs Geetha.R regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, Bindhu P.S, claims that the defendant, Geetha.R, borrowed Rs. 4,00,000 and issued a cheque which was subsequently dishonored. The case centers on the recovery of the borrowed amount plus interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 613/2024
Case between Sidhiq. A. vs Navas.A. regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiff Sidhiq. A. claims that the defendant Navas.A. borrowed an amount of Rs. 5,95,000/- and issued cheques that were subsequently dishonoured. The plaintiff is seeking to recover Rs. 2,02,033/- along with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 733/2024
Case between Shylaja vs Suresh.D. regarding Realisation of Money
Shylaja is the plaintiff who has filed a suit against Suresh.D. for the recovery of a borrowed amount. The defendant borrowed money from the plaintiff for his house construction and failed to repay as promised.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 433/2018
Case between Rajive Paul vs Nizar regarding recovery of money
Rajive Paul, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nizar, the defendant, for the recovery of money concerning gold ornaments sold on credit. The defendant failed to pay the outstanding amount after some cheques were dishonored.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 739/2023
Case between Sheela Shaji vs Biju. G.R regarding realisation of money.
Sheela Shaji, the plaintiff, lent Biju. G.R an amount of Rs. 2,50,000 and was issued a cheque that was dishonoured. Sheela Shaji filed the suit seeking to recover Rs. 2,69,250 along with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.156/2024
Case between George vs Vineesh M. B. regarding realisation of money
George is the plaintiff who operates a fuel business and alleges that Vineesh, the defendant, owes him money for diesel purchased on credit. The case revolves around the dishonouring of a cheque issued by the defendant towards this debt.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.109/2024
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
The case involves petitioners Rini Titus and Francis Gabriel seeking to restrain the respondents Stephen Gomez, Shaila, and Sherly Rajendran from trespassing into their properties and creating a new pathway. The petitioners claim that the respondents have falsely claimed a right of way through their properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 627/2014
Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The petitioner/defendant, Safunnisa, is contesting a request for further information from the plaintiff, Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz, regarding a school admission register. The court is reviewing the plaintiff's compliance with previous orders about document production.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 988/2016
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Radha, the plaintiff, is involved in a case against Sujatha and Anilkumar regarding the fixation of boundaries and injunctions related to property. The plaintiff has requested to withdraw the suit to file a fresh case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 579/2012
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
Anilkumar is the petitioner seeking to implead additional defendants in an ongoing civil case. The court has dismissed the application as belated without valid reasons.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 877/2024
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
Ramla Beevi has filed a suit against Sulfikkar for the recovery of Rs 2,29,500 along with interest. She claims that Sulfikkar borrowed money from her, and despite requests, he has not returned it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 773/2024
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
C. Baburajan Pillai filed an application for an interim injunction against Nair Service Society and others regarding the conduct of elections and alleged illegal appointments of an adhoc committee. The case involves disputes over the administration of the Taluk Union.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 1085/2023
Case between Kulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding advancing the case.
Kulsam Beevi filed a petition to advance the case against Kamarudeen and others. The petition was heard in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 659/2024
Case between Bhadradasaru vs Vijayan Pillai et al regarding Injunction
Bhadradasaru, the petitioner, is seeking an injunction against Vijayan Pillai and others who claim rights over the Sree Nagaraja Temple, which he alleges is part of his family's property. The respondents dispute this claim, asserting the temple is on government land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 963/2023
Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
Moly Kutty filed a petition for a Temporary Injunction against Sajitha and Vidhesh regarding an illegally constructed kitchen shed that causes health hazards due to smoke and foul smell. The defendants reside next to the plaintiff and have constructed the shed without permission, prompting the plaintiff to seek court intervention.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.1107/2016
Case between Mohanan vs Mani et al regarding acceptance of documents
The case involves a petition filed by the defendants for accepting certain documents. The matter was heard and decided by the court on 08/04/2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 167/2025
Case between Goutham Krishna vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioner, Goutham Krishna, seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to a pathway serving their property. The defendants contest these claims, asserting their rights to the same pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.915/2024
Case between K.Vasanthakumaran vs Mohanan regarding Temporary Injunction
K.Vasanthakumaran, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan, the defendant, to prevent obstruction of access to his property. The plaintiff claims rights over a pathway leading to the kitchen of his house, while the defendant contests the ownership of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 857/2024
Case between P.Vilasini et al vs Nirmala et al regarding injunction order
The Petitioners/Plaintiffs, P.Vilasini and P.Vinodini, filed a petition to advance and extend the injunction order. The court dismissed the application after finding the injunction order to be absolute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 115/2025
Case between Smt.Bishi Mathew vs Subrahmanian @ Supran et al regarding advance posting of case and interim injunction
Smt. Bishi Mathew, a retired teacher, is the plaintiff seeking to advance the hearing of her case for an interim injunction. The respondents, Subrahmanian @ Supran and Suvarna, have not filed any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.579/2012
Case between Anil Kumar vs Valsala et al regarding amendment of plaint for fixation of boundary of temple property
Anil Kumar, the petitioner, seeks to amend the plaint to fix the northern boundary of a temple property as per an old survey plan. The respondents, Valsala and others, object to this amendment, claiming it is based on a false report.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 749/2015
Case between Dakshayani, K.C. et al vs State of Kerala regarding reopening the evidence.
This case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to reopen evidence. The State of Kerala is the defendant represented by the Secretary of the Revenue Department.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 137/2019
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Babu Balakrishna Panicker et al regarding mandatory injunction for removal of obstructions.
Gopakumar and Geethakumari, the plaintiffs, filed a suit against Babu Balakrishna Panicker and Preetha, the defendants, regarding the alleged obstruction of a pathway. The defendants sought an interim mandatory injunction to remove these obstructions as they impeded access to their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 425/2024
Case between Dr. Geethakumari vs Pradeepkumar.P regarding lifting of attachment
The petitioner, Pradeepkumar.P, is seeking to lift the attachment on his property in a suit filed by Dr. Geethakumari for recovery of money. The case involves the petitioner providing security to satisfy the potential decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 142/2016
Case between Mohanan et al vs Santha et al regarding EA in EP in OS
This case involves petitioners Mohanan and others against respondents Santha and others regarding execution proceedings. The petition was heard by the court after being filed under the civil procedure code.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 176/2018
Case between M.I.Alexander Panicker et al vs Balakrishna Pillai et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition suit filed by M.I.Alexander Panicker on behalf of the legal heirs of Gopala Pillai against the legal heirs of Paramu Pillai and Nani Amma. The petitioner seeks to review an order related to the cross-examination of a witness.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 291/2024
Case between Najitha.S vs Naushad et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The case involves Najitha.S as the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against Naushad and others regarding property usage and construction rights. The dispute centers on the peaceful enjoyment of certain amenities situated on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order in IA 3/2025 and IA 4/2025
The plaintiffs, led by Radhamani Amma, are seeking to review a previous order that dismissed their petitions for reopening evidence related to easement rights on a disputed property. They argue that the dismissal has denied them a fair opportunity to present essential evidence and has led to a miscarriage of justice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 862/2017
Case between Appukuttan Pillai et al vs Easwary Amma regarding settlement of matter
The case involves a petition filed by the first defendant, Easwary Amma. The matter is almost settled, and the court has allowed the interim application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 705/2014
Case between State Bank of India vs Hena.S et al regarding EP No. 151/2020
The State Bank of India filed a petition against the judgment debtors Hena.S, N.Sivanandan, and Shah regarding an execution petition. The Court dismissed the execution petition for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 748/2019
Case between Subair et al vs Basheerkutty et al regarding maintainability of a suit for boundary fixation and recovery of possession.
The case involves the maintainability of a suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking the fixation of the boundary of a property, recovery of possession, and an injunction. The defendants challenged the suit on grounds of lack of title, possession, and necessary parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 506/2020
Case between Reshmi.N.R. vs Retnammal et al regarding partition
The case involves a partition suit filed by Reshmi.N.R. The petitioners/defendants are seeking a supplementary preliminary decree to declare their shares in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.221/2025
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
Rajkapoor.K filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Sulfikkar and the Authorised Officer of Canara Bank from forcibly evicting him from a property without returning a deposit. The plaintiff claims to reside in the property and is facing eviction due to a notice issued by the second defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 721/2024
Case between Balachandran Pillai.. V. et al vs The Nair Service Society et al regarding directing document production.
The petitioners are seeking to set aside the election of certain office bearers of the Karayogam, claiming the election was conducted illegally. They argue that relevant documents held by the fourth defendant are essential for a fair trial.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won