Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 579/2012

Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-02-11
Duration
approximately-12 years 3 months
Case Code No.
579
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anilkumar is the petitioner seeking to implead additional defendants in an ongoing civil case. The court has dismissed the application as belated without valid reasons.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has dismissed the impleading application filed by Anilkumar due to delay in filing and lack of valid reasons. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has dismissed the impleading application filed by Anilkumar due to delay in filing and lack of valid reasons. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The IA is highly belated and lacks justifiable reasons for the delay.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anilkumar
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsala
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chithralouji
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hilariyana
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudevan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Usha
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.Deepa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Borris Paul
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D.Sunil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suresh Kumar.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Remya Reghupalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The IA is filed to implead addl.13th defendant in this case.
Evidence:
Hence IA is only liable to be dismissed and I do so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won