Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 137/2019

Case between Gopakumar et al vs Babu Balakrishna Panicker et al regarding mandatory injunction for removal of obstructions.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
approximately-6 years 20 days
Case Code No.
137
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gopakumar and Geethakumari, the plaintiffs, filed a suit against Babu Balakrishna Panicker and Preetha, the defendants, regarding the alleged obstruction of a pathway. The defendants sought an interim mandatory injunction to remove these obstructions as they impeded access to their property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the defendants' application for an interim mandatory injunction, directing the plaintiffs to remove the obstructions on the pathway within 15 days, failing which the defendants may do so through court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Interim mandatory injunction directing removal of obstructions.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the defendants' application for an interim mandatory injunction, directing the plaintiffs to remove the obstructions on the pathway within 15 days, failing which the defendants may do so through court.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants established their entitlement to an injunction to restore the pathway according to the appellate court's order.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners/defendants alleged that the plaintiffs made obstructions over the counter claim C schedule pathway by violating the order of Appellate Court in CMA 27/20 and CMA 41/19 dated 22/09/2021.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA allowed the respondents/plaintiffs are directed to remove the obstructions over the counter claim C schedule way, with in 15 days from today, otherwise the petitioners/defendants are entitled to remove the same through the process of the Court.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopakumar
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Geethakumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Balakrishna Panicker
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Preetha
Plaintiffs Documents
Commission report, injunction application.
Defendants Documents
Commission report, rough sketch and photographs.

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Geetha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.S.Krishna Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the plaintiffs to remove the obstructions over the counter claim C schedule way.
Evidence:
In the result, IA allowed the respondents/plaintiffs are directed to remove the obstructions over the counter claim C schedule way, with in 15 days from today.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report establishes the status of the C schedule pathway and supports the necessity of the injunction sought by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report Mahazar
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report details the obstructions present on the C schedule pathway, which is crucial for supporting the defendants' claim.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/21/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won