Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.915/2024

Case between K.Vasanthakumaran vs Mohanan regarding Temporary Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 4 months
Case Code No.
915
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K.Vasanthakumaran, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan, the defendant, to prevent obstruction of access to his property. The plaintiff claims rights over a pathway leading to the kitchen of his house, while the defendant contests the ownership of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the interim application filed by K.Vasanthakumaran seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the interim application filed by K.Vasanthakumaran seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case and was found to have alternative access to his property.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff fails to prove a prima facie case and the balance of convenience in their favour.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Vasanthakumaran
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Partition Deed No. 3743/1995 of Kollam SRO, Tax Receipt, Proceedings of Kollam East Village Office.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.Abdul Shahan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thirumullavaram G.Sivasankara Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request to restrain defendant from trespassing and obstructing access.
Evidence:
In the result, IA dismissed. No costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original partition deed indicates plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt supports the plaintiff's claim over the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Proceedings
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proceedings document indicates official recognition of plaintiff's rights.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commissioner report assesses property boundaries and access rights.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/04/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won