Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 176/2018

Case between M.I.Alexander Panicker et al vs Balakrishna Pillai et al regarding partition of property

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-06-23
Duration
approximately-7 years 4 months
Case Code No.
176
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a partition suit filed by M.I.Alexander Panicker on behalf of the legal heirs of Gopala Pillai against the legal heirs of Paramu Pillai and Nani Amma. The petitioner seeks to review an order related to the cross-examination of a witness.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application for review of the order dated 13/06/2025 with costs to the first defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application for review of the order dated 13/06/2025 with costs to the first defendant.
Key Reasoning:
The request for review was found to be not legally sustainable as the order sheet merely documented courtroom events.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The entries made in the order sheet dated 13/06/2025 and the deposition of PW1 reflect only the actual proceedings that took place before the court on that date.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA dismissed with the costs of 1st defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.I.Alexander Panicker
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopala Pillai
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Others
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Balakrishna Pillai
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paramu Pillai
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nani Amma
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Others
Plaintiffs Documents
Partition suit filed on 21/02/2018, Order dated 13/06/2025
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.I.Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akshadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Review of the order dated 13/06/2025.
Evidence:
The request for the review is not legally sustainable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Chief Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Filed for the trial on 09/06/2025.
Reference:
Document Type: Order Sheet
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains records of proceedings on 13/06/2025.
Reference:
Document Type: Deposition of PW1
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains recorded statements during the trial.
Reference:
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The suit challenges this partition deed.
Reference:
No. 5126/1995

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 02/21/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won