Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 963/2023

Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration
approximately-1 year 5 months
Case Code No.
963
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Moly Kutty filed a petition for a Temporary Injunction against Sajitha and Vidhesh regarding an illegally constructed kitchen shed that causes health hazards due to smoke and foul smell. The defendants reside next to the plaintiff and have constructed the shed without permission, prompting the plaintiff to seek court intervention.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the interim application by restraining the defendants from using the illegally constructed shed as a kitchen or for any other purpose causing pollution until the case is resolved.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants 1 and 2 are restrained from using the plaint B schedule shed as a kitchen or for any other purpose that will create smoke, foul smell, or pollution.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the interim application by restraining the defendants from using the illegally constructed shed as a kitchen or for any other purpose causing pollution until the case is resolved.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has a prima facie case and the balance of convenience is in favour of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has prima facie case and the balance of convenience is heavily tilts in favour of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the IA is allowed as follows: The defendants 1 and 2 are hereby restrained from using the plaint B schedule shed as a kitchen or for any other purpose which will create smoke, foul smell, or any sort of pollution that causes inconvenience to the plaintiff and her family members residing in the plaint A schedule property, till the disposal of this suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moly Kutty
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajitha
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vidhesh
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Secretary, Elampalloor Grama Panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Sale Deed No. 1500/2017, Tax Receipt issued from Elampalloor Village Office, Petition, Order from Gramapanchayath Secretary, Report of FHC, Elampalloor, Photographs (4 Nos.)
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abhishek B.Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P.Gopalakrishna Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To restrain the defendants from using the plaint B schedule shed as a kitchen.
Evidence:
The defendants 1 and 2 are hereby restrained from using the plaint B schedule shed as a kitchen or for any other purpose which will create smoke, foul smell, or any sort of pollution that causes inconvenience to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To prevent further construction by defendants 1 and 2 after demolition.
Evidence:
The IA is allowed as follows: The defendants 1 and 2 are hereby restrained from using the plaint B schedule shed as a kitchen.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided proof of property tax payment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formulated the basis of the plaintiff’s request for relief.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed that the panchayat ordered the demolition of the illegal shed.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Health Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmed that the shed's use as a kitchen was causing health problems.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Photographs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supported the claim regarding the construction and its impacts.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided findings from the inspection of the properties.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Mahazar
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Documented the conditions of the properties as noted by the Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/14/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between East Kallada Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Ltd. No. Q 1455 et al vs Dr. Bimalkumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sreej A.C. et al vs Syamalakumari regarding eviction.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam.
Civil Suit Defendant Won