Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 626/2024

Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
Case Code No.
626
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Soudamini and Vilasini, filed for a temporary injunction against the defendants, Rejimon, Sunil Kumar, and Sahadevan, to prevent them from encroaching on their property and causing damage. The defendants allegedly trespassed and demolished parts of the plaintiffs' property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for temporary injunction and made it absolute until the disposal of the suit, ensuring that the plaintiffs' property would be protected from further encroachment by the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for temporary injunction and made it absolute until the disposal of the suit, ensuring that the plaintiffs' property would be protected from further encroachment by the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs have a prima facie case and the balance of convenience is in their favour.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience is in their favour. If the injunction as sought is refused, it may cause irreparable injury to them.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition allowed. Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Soudamini
Party Age
73
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vilasini
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rejimon
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil Kumar
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sahadevan
Party Age
50
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of sale deed No. 2242/2002, Land tax receipt issued from Perayam Village Office, Copy of Joint Release Deed No. 3598/2012, Land tax receipt issued from Perayam Village Office.
Defendants Documents
Commission report prepared and submitted by Adv.Commissioner Reshma Raj.R, Mahazar prepared and submitted by Adv.Commissioner Reshma Raj.R.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dhanya Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit, restraining the defendants from entering the plaint A and B schedule properties.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition allowed. Interim injunction made absolute till the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of sale deed No.2242/02 of Kundara SRO evidencing the ownership of the first plaintiff over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt issued from Perayam Village Office confirming the tax payment by the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Joint Release Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Joint Release Deed No.3598/2012 of Kundara SRO evidencing the property ownership of the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt issued from Perayam Village Office confirming the tax payment by the son of the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and Mahassar prepared by Adv. Sri. Reshma Raj detailing the encroachment and alterations made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
KOLLAM
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between East Kallada Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Ltd. No. Q 1455 et al vs Dr. Bimalkumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sreej A.C. et al vs Syamalakumari regarding eviction.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won