Similar Cases
Based on: OS. 963/2023 — Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.221/2025
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
Rajkapoor.K filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Sulfikkar and the Authorised Officer of Canara Bank from forcibly evicting him from a property without returning a deposit. The plaintiff claims to reside in the property and is facing eviction due to a notice issued by the second defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 188/2025
Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
The case involves Chellamma and her daughter Thankamani as petitioners against Thampi, the respondent. The petitioners seek an injunction to prevent the respondent from evicting them from their residence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 626/2024
Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.
The plaintiffs, Soudamini and Vilasini, filed for a temporary injunction against the defendants, Rejimon, Sunil Kumar, and Sahadevan, to prevent them from encroaching on their property and causing damage. The defendants allegedly trespassed and demolished parts of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 285/2018
Case between East Kallada Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Ltd. No. Q 1455 et al vs Dr. Bimalkumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the East Kallada Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society Ltd. which filed a suit against Dr. Bimalkumar seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent eviction from a rented property. The plaintiffs allege threats of eviction by the defendant, claiming unlawful possession after the expiry of the lease agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.146/2025
Case between Sreej A.C. et al vs Syamalakumari regarding eviction.
The plaintiffs, Sreej A.C., Chellamma, and Sreeja, filed a suit for eviction against the defendant, Syamalakumari. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RC(OP).No. 55/2024
Case between Y.Shajahan vs A.R.Thaha regarding eviction
The case involves a petition filed by Y.Shajahan against A.R.Thaha for eviction under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was absent and did not provide evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No. 620/2017
Case between K.Sivadasan et al vs B.Sivadasan et al regarding eviction and realization of arrears of rent
The plaintiffs, K.Sivadasan and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, B.Sivadasan and others, to prevent their forcible eviction from a property. The case involves disputes concerning rent agreements and the respondents' claim to possess the property after the lease has expired.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RC(OP) No. 46/2024
Case between Lovely Sasidharan et al vs Quilon Pravasi International LLP regarding eviction
Lovely Sasidharan, the petitioner, filed for eviction against Quilon Pravasi International LLP, the counter petitioner, due to non-payment of rent. The counter petitioner had defaulted on rent payments since August 2023, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 335/2025
Case between Sreehari.M vs The Manager, The Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd et al regarding injunction against salary deduction
Sreehari.M, the plaintiff, filed for an injunction against defendants for unauthorized salary deductions made to recover a loan liability of his deceased father. The plaintiff argues that these deductions are illegal and without consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 897/2024
Case between D.Ambujakshi Amma vs Raju Achari @ K.Raju regarding Realisation of Money
The plaintiffs, joint owners of a property, filed a suit against the defendant for defaulting on rent payments for a shop he leased. After failed attempts to resolve the matter, they sought payment of overdue rent and interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 103/2021
Case between Jacob.K.Baby et al vs Subhash regarding Eviction
The plaintiffs, Jacob K. Baby and Mariamma, are seeking the eviction of the defendant Subhash from a shop room. The defendant is accused of defaulting on rent payments and unauthorized closure of the shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 570/2025
Case between Anil Jose et al vs Fr. Mary John et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration of easement by prescription.
The petitioners, Anil Jose and Vijimol P.S., are siblings filing for an injunction against defendants, including Fr. Mary John and Joy N, who are associated with St. Michael Church concerning a pathway alleged to be threatened with closure. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants are attempting to illegally encroach upon the pathway used by 40 families.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 276/2022
Case between Anchalummood Block Rural Housing Co-operative Ltd. vs Vaheeda regarding recovery of possession
The plaintiff, Anchalummood Block Rural Housing Co-operative Ltd., is seeking recovery of possession from the defendant, Vaheeda, who had defaulted in paying rent. The plaintiff claims entitlement to eviction due to failure to adhere to the rental agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 848/2024
Case between Gopalakrisna Pillai vs Johnson Philip regarding mandatory injunction and rent arrears.
Gopalakrisna Pillai, a senior citizen and custodian of a property, filed a suit against Johnson Philip for a mandatory injunction and recovery of rent arrears. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has failed to vacate the premises and pay due rent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.109/2024
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
The case involves petitioners Rini Titus and Francis Gabriel seeking to restrain the respondents Stephen Gomez, Shaila, and Sherly Rajendran from trespassing into their properties and creating a new pathway. The petitioners claim that the respondents have falsely claimed a right of way through their properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 627/2014
Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The petitioner/defendant, Safunnisa, is contesting a request for further information from the plaintiff, Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz, regarding a school admission register. The court is reviewing the plaintiff's compliance with previous orders about document production.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 988/2016
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Radha, the plaintiff, is involved in a case against Sujatha and Anilkumar regarding the fixation of boundaries and injunctions related to property. The plaintiff has requested to withdraw the suit to file a fresh case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 579/2012
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
Anilkumar is the petitioner seeking to implead additional defendants in an ongoing civil case. The court has dismissed the application as belated without valid reasons.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 676/2018
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
The case involves V.M.Jayaprakasan and additional plaintiffs seeking a permanent injunction against Ushakumary and others to prevent obstruction of boundary wall construction on their property. The plaintiffs claim ownership and the defendants are accused of attempting to encroach on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 877/2024
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
Ramla Beevi has filed a suit against Sulfikkar for the recovery of Rs 2,29,500 along with interest. She claims that Sulfikkar borrowed money from her, and despite requests, he has not returned it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 773/2024
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
C. Baburajan Pillai filed an application for an interim injunction against Nair Service Society and others regarding the conduct of elections and alleged illegal appointments of an adhoc committee. The case involves disputes over the administration of the Taluk Union.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 1085/2023
Case between Kulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding advancing the case.
Kulsam Beevi filed a petition to advance the case against Kamarudeen and others. The petition was heard in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 659/2024
Case between Bhadradasaru vs Vijayan Pillai et al regarding Injunction
Bhadradasaru, the petitioner, is seeking an injunction against Vijayan Pillai and others who claim rights over the Sree Nagaraja Temple, which he alleges is part of his family's property. The respondents dispute this claim, asserting the temple is on government land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.1107/2016
Case between Mohanan vs Mani et al regarding acceptance of documents
The case involves a petition filed by the defendants for accepting certain documents. The matter was heard and decided by the court on 08/04/2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 167/2025
Case between Goutham Krishna vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioner, Goutham Krishna, seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to a pathway serving their property. The defendants contest these claims, asserting their rights to the same pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.915/2024
Case between K.Vasanthakumaran vs Mohanan regarding Temporary Injunction
K.Vasanthakumaran, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan, the defendant, to prevent obstruction of access to his property. The plaintiff claims rights over a pathway leading to the kitchen of his house, while the defendant contests the ownership of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 857/2024
Case between P.Vilasini et al vs Nirmala et al regarding injunction order
The Petitioners/Plaintiffs, P.Vilasini and P.Vinodini, filed a petition to advance and extend the injunction order. The court dismissed the application after finding the injunction order to be absolute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 115/2025
Case between Smt.Bishi Mathew vs Subrahmanian @ Supran et al regarding advance posting of case and interim injunction
Smt. Bishi Mathew, a retired teacher, is the plaintiff seeking to advance the hearing of her case for an interim injunction. The respondents, Subrahmanian @ Supran and Suvarna, have not filed any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.579/2012
Case between Anil Kumar vs Valsala et al regarding amendment of plaint for fixation of boundary of temple property
Anil Kumar, the petitioner, seeks to amend the plaint to fix the northern boundary of a temple property as per an old survey plan. The respondents, Valsala and others, object to this amendment, claiming it is based on a false report.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 749/2015
Case between Dakshayani, K.C. et al vs State of Kerala regarding reopening the evidence.
This case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to reopen evidence. The State of Kerala is the defendant represented by the Secretary of the Revenue Department.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 89/2022
Case between Padma Kumari vs Madhusoodanan Pillai et al regarding Realisation of Money
Padma Kumari, the plaintiff, is seeking to realise an amount of Rs. 2,00,000 from the defendants for cutting down valuable trees on her property. The defendant claims they weren't responsible for the actions of their tenant who is alleged to have committed the act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 137/2019
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Babu Balakrishna Panicker et al regarding mandatory injunction for removal of obstructions.
Gopakumar and Geethakumari, the plaintiffs, filed a suit against Babu Balakrishna Panicker and Preetha, the defendants, regarding the alleged obstruction of a pathway. The defendants sought an interim mandatory injunction to remove these obstructions as they impeded access to their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 425/2024
Case between Dr. Geethakumari vs Pradeepkumar.P regarding lifting of attachment
The petitioner, Pradeepkumar.P, is seeking to lift the attachment on his property in a suit filed by Dr. Geethakumari for recovery of money. The case involves the petitioner providing security to satisfy the potential decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 142/2016
Case between Mohanan et al vs Santha et al regarding EA in EP in OS
This case involves petitioners Mohanan and others against respondents Santha and others regarding execution proceedings. The petition was heard by the court after being filed under the civil procedure code.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 176/2018
Case between M.I.Alexander Panicker et al vs Balakrishna Pillai et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition suit filed by M.I.Alexander Panicker on behalf of the legal heirs of Gopala Pillai against the legal heirs of Paramu Pillai and Nani Amma. The petitioner seeks to review an order related to the cross-examination of a witness.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 291/2024
Case between Najitha.S vs Naushad et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The case involves Najitha.S as the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against Naushad and others regarding property usage and construction rights. The dispute centers on the peaceful enjoyment of certain amenities situated on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order in IA 3/2025 and IA 4/2025
The plaintiffs, led by Radhamani Amma, are seeking to review a previous order that dismissed their petitions for reopening evidence related to easement rights on a disputed property. They argue that the dismissal has denied them a fair opportunity to present essential evidence and has led to a miscarriage of justice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 217/2025
Case between Anil.B vs Prathap.R.S regarding conditional attachment before judgment
Anil.B filed a petition for conditional attachment against Prathap.R.S due to non-payment of a cheque amounting to Rs.7 lakhs. The plaintiff claims the defendant failed to pay despite multiple agreements and promises.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 862/2017
Case between Appukuttan Pillai et al vs Easwary Amma regarding settlement of matter
The case involves a petition filed by the first defendant, Easwary Amma. The matter is almost settled, and the court has allowed the interim application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 705/2014
Case between State Bank of India vs Hena.S et al regarding EP No. 151/2020
The State Bank of India filed a petition against the judgment debtors Hena.S, N.Sivanandan, and Shah regarding an execution petition. The Court dismissed the execution petition for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 416/2022
Case between Kunjumol vs The Kollam Corporation et al regarding permanent injunction.
The plaintiffs, Kunjumol and Aloysius, are husband and wife seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, including the Kollam Corporation and other governmental bodies. They claim to have continuous possession of 3.5 cents of land against illegal encroachment and threats from individuals affiliated with the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 748/2019
Case between Subair et al vs Basheerkutty et al regarding maintainability of a suit for boundary fixation and recovery of possession.
The case involves the maintainability of a suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking the fixation of the boundary of a property, recovery of possession, and an injunction. The defendants challenged the suit on grounds of lack of title, possession, and necessary parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 506/2020
Case between Reshmi.N.R. vs Retnammal et al regarding partition
The case involves a partition suit filed by Reshmi.N.R. The petitioners/defendants are seeking a supplementary preliminary decree to declare their shares in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 16/2020
Case between R.Bahuleyan et al vs Prasad.K et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, R.Bahuleyan and B.Devarajan, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Prasad.K, Bindhu, Perayam Grama Panchayath, and The Deputy Director of Panchayat, to demolish an unauthorized construction affecting their property. The defendants have constructed a thatched shop without permitted authorization.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 525/2023
Case between Ramachandran Nair vs The Travancore Devaswom Board et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff, Ramachandran Nair, is the managing trustee of the Karipezhathu family temple and is claiming absolute title over the property against the defendants, who are attempting to claim control over it. The court was asked to declare the plaintiff's title and prevent the defendants from interfering.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 721/2024
Case between Balachandran Pillai.. V. et al vs The Nair Service Society et al regarding directing document production.
The petitioners are seeking to set aside the election of certain office bearers of the Karayogam, claiming the election was conducted illegally. They argue that relevant documents held by the fourth defendant are essential for a fair trial.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won