Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RC(OP).No. 55/2024

Case between Y.Shajahan vs A.R.Thaha regarding eviction

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-08-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by Y.Shajahan against A.R.Thaha for eviction under the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The court dismissed the petition as the petitioner was absent and did not provide evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and failure to present evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and failure to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since the petitioner not ready to adduce any evidence, petition dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Y.Shajahan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.R.Thaha
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Hariprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Veena Thampi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Raju Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Devika.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Meghna Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shiji.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.Vinayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition dismissed for default as the petitioner was not ready to adduce any evidence.
Evidence:
Since the petitioner not ready to adduce any evidence, petition dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between Y.Shajahan vs A.R.Thaha regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Y.Shajahan vs A.R.Thaha regarding eviction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between K.Sivadasan et al vs B.Sivadasan et al regarding eviction and realization of arrears of rent
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sreej A.C. et al vs Syamalakumari regarding eviction.
The Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won