Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 620/2017

Case between K.Sivadasan et al vs B.Sivadasan et al regarding eviction and realization of arrears of rent

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-8 years 10 months
Case Code No.
620
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, K.Sivadasan and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, B.Sivadasan and others, to prevent their forcible eviction from a property. The case involves disputes concerning rent agreements and the respondents' claim to possess the property after the lease has expired.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants to vacate the plaint schedule property and pay arrears of rent. The court dismissed the OS No. 620/2017.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to surrender the vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiffs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, ordering the defendants to vacate the plaint schedule property and pay arrears of rent. The court dismissed the OS No. 620/2017.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the plaint schedule property and the defendants had no legal basis to remain in possession.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The existence of a landlord/tenant relationship is admitted by the defendants 2 to 4. It is also an admitted fact that these additional defendants continued their business in the plaint schedule property after the death of the 1st defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

OS No. 620/2017 is dismissed with costs. OS No. 1090/2018 is decreed with costs as follows: The additional defendants 2 to 4 are directed to surrender the vacant possession of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiffs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.Sivadasan
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indira
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o Late K.Sivadasan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jayapalan
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o Late K.Sivadasan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raji
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o Late K.Sivadasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B.Sivadasan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Retnarajakumari
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Sivadasan
Plaintiffs Documents
Attested copy of Rent Deed dated 01-10-2015, License issued from Department of Industries, Government of Kerala, License issued from Kollam Corporation.
Defendants Documents
Legal Notice dated 08-10-2018.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kallada M. Balachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R.Geetha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nisha L.Prakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Megha.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dhanya.Y
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent injunction against alleged illegal eviction.
Evidence:
OS No. 620/2017 is dismissed with costs.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs sought the eviction of the defendant from the property.
Evidence:
OS No. 1090/2018 is decreed with costs as follows: The additional defendants are directed to surrender the vacant possession.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs to recover arrears of rent along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to recover rent arrears at the rate of Rs. 5000/- per month along with 12% interest.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to Rs. 10,000/- per month as damages.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 10,000/- per month together with interest, as damages.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to claim costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to recover the costs of the proceedings from the additional defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the terms of tenancy and rent amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
License for establishing the business.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
License issued by Kollam Corporation for business operation.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt from Kollam Corporation confirming business activities.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms payment of building tax for the premises.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notifies the plaintiff regarding the lease and demands.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proof of delivery of legal notices.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of legal notice by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Will Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the transfer of property ownership upon death.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirms the death of the original defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Rent Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Relates to the lease agreement with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Proof of tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on the conditions of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Mahazar
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details about the property inspections by the advocate commissioner.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nizarudeen vs Oseela Beevi et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Jalaja vs Vijaya Kumar et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won