Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 167/2025

Case between Goutham Krishna vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding Temporary Injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
Case Code No.
167
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Goutham Krishna, seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to a pathway serving their property. The defendants contest these claims, asserting their rights to the same pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the injunction application filed by the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from causing any obstruction to the use of the B schedule pathway.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are restrained from causing any obstruction to the use and enjoyment of the plaint B schedule pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the injunction application filed by the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from causing any obstruction to the use of the B schedule pathway.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding the right of way over the B schedule pathway.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The existence of the B schedule way and the rights of both the plaintiff and the defendants over it are admitted by the parties. Ext.A1 shows that the plaintiff purchased A schedule property, including a right of way over the B schedule pathway.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA allowed as follows; The defendants are restrained from causing any obstruction to the use and enjoyment of the plaint B schedule pathway, and from committing any acts of waste therein until the final disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Goutham Krishna
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Krishnakumar.V
Party Age
57
Relation
Father
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh Kumar
Party Age
57
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roja
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Sale Deed No. 1955/I/2021, Tax Receipt of Sakthikulangara Village Office, Petition submitted before Sub Inspector of Police, Kollam.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith A.Khader
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the defendants from causing obstruction to the use and enjoyment of the B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The defendants are restrained from causing any obstruction to the use and enjoyment of the plaint B schedule pathway, and from committing any acts of waste therein until the final disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff purchased A schedule property, including a right of way over the B schedule pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claim regarding property taxes.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relevant communication related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Petition submitted before Sub Inspector of Police regarding the matter.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Caveat
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates prior legal actions regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report by Kollam Municipal Corporation related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Record of transaction relevant to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Gmail application indicating communication regarding the matter.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Petition submitted before the Secretary, Kollam Corporation, related to property issues.
Reference:
B1
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Application submitted before the Village Officer regarding the matter.
Reference:
B2
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Petition submitted before the Chief Minister regarding the dispute.
Reference:
B3
Document Type: Reply
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Reply from Chief Minister, Government of Kerala addressing the issues raised.
Reference:
B4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice issued by Kollam Corporation regarding the property.
Reference:
B5
Document Type: Reply
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Response from Sub Collector, Kollam related to property disputes.
Reference:
B6
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Petition submitted before the City Police Commissioner regarding the matter.
Reference:
B7
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Notice from Kollam Corporation regarding the property.
Reference:
B8
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Petition submitted before Health Officer, Kollam Corporation related to the situation.
Reference:
B9
Document Type: Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commissioner’s report marking observations on the properties involved.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won