Case Summary
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed both IAs 3/2025 and 4/2025 filed by the plaintiffs for lack of sufficient reasons to re-open the evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The applications were dismissed as they did not provide sufficient reasons to warrant the re-opening of evidence.
The applications were dismissed as they did not provide sufficient reasons to warrant the re-opening of evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA 3/25 and IA 4/25 are only liable to be dismissed and I do so.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radhamani Amma
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sarada Lekshmi
- Relation
- D/o.
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Akash Anil
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kamalammal
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Babu Anupama
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kerala State
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Travancore Devaswom Board
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant Devaswom Commissioner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lekshminada Sree Mahalekshmi Temple
- Relation
- Sub Group Officer.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sree Mahalekshmi Temple Advisory Samithi
- Relation
- represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Reghuvarma
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B.Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction regarding the right of easement over the H schedule property.
Evidence:
IA 3/25 and IA 4/25 are only liable to be dismissed and I do so.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Right of way obstruction
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2013