OS. No. 459/2020

Case between Shyamala vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt.Ragi.S.

Order Date

2025-09-29

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner Shyamala filed a petition to review an order rejecting her plaint due to non-payment of the court fee. The respondents remained absent, prompting the court to grant another opportunity to the petitioner to proceed with her case.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court reviewed the prior order and allowed the petition, restoring the suit on file.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner was granted the opportunity to proceed since the petition was filed in time and the respondents were absent.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

For the reason stated by the petitioner and in the interest of justice I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner/plaintiff to proceed with the matter.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the petition is allowed order dated 28/3/25 is reviewed and the suit is restored on file.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Shyamala
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kerala State represented by District Colector, Kollam.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Tahasidhar, Kollam.

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Village Officer, East Vilalge Village Office, Kollam.

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: B.L Prasasnth
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The petition is allowed and the order dated 28/3/25 is reviewed, restoring the suit on file.

Evidence: