Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 425/2024

Case between Dr. Geethakumari vs Pradeepkumar.P regarding lifting of attachment

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
approximately-0 years 9 months
Case Code No.
425
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Pradeepkumar.P, is seeking to lift the attachment on his property in a suit filed by Dr. Geethakumari for recovery of money. The case involves the petitioner providing security to satisfy the potential decree in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the petition to lift the attachment over the plaint schedule property. The court accepted the FD receipt produced by the defendant as sufficient security.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Attachment over plaint schedule property is lifted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the petition to lift the attachment over the plaint schedule property. The court accepted the FD receipt produced by the defendant as sufficient security.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the defendant provided sufficient security for the debt.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The purpose of attachment u/o. 38 R.5 of Code of Civil Procedure, is to ensure recovery of money by the creditor after obtaining the decree from the civil court of law.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 04/2024 is allowed. Attachment over plaint schedule property is lifted.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Geethakumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pradeepkumar.P
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
FD receipt in A/c No.43820164285 dated 13/02/2025 of State Bank of India, Anandavaleeswaram branch

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.V.Vraj Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. M.I.Alexander Panicker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Lifting the attachment over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, IA 04/2024 is allowed. Attachment over plaint schedule property is lifted.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: FD receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
The court accepted the FD receipt produced by the defendant as sufficient security to lift the attachment over the property.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 06/06/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won