Similar Cases
Based on: OS 151/2023 — Case between REEJESH @ RIJEESH vs 1ASHOKAN et al regarding issuance of summons to the witness
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 114/2023
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
Meethale Arayammal Ismayil filed a petition to set aside an ex parte decree dated 13.06.2024, arguing he had sufficient cause for his non-appearance due to health issues. Kokkandiyeri Mahamood, the respondent, objected, claiming the petition was without bonafides.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 84/2024
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
The case involves a petition filed by Kombiyullathil Thazakuniiyil Althaf against Kurunnam Veettil Abdulla and others regarding a request for documents in relation to a criminal case. The court found that the petitioner should apply for the certified copies directly from the JFCM Court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 127/2014
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
N. P. Padmakumar and others are petitioners seeking to reopen evidence in a long-pending case against Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The petitiioners aimed to mark a photocopy of a plan and permit issued previously.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 15/2024
Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
Chandran, the plaintiff, filed a petition against the Secretary of Nadapuram Grama Panchayath and other defendants. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 59/2025
Case between Shahida. T vs Jameela Abdul Nazar et al regarding injunction against forceful eviction.
Shahida. T is the petitioner seeking to be impleaded as the 2nd defendant in a suit for injunction filed against her husband. The court found that she lacks authority over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 29/2013
Case between KUNNOTH KUNHIKKELU vs KUNNOTH RAJU et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
The case involves KUNNOTH KUNHIKKELU as the petitioner against KUNNOTH RAJU and others regarding a petition to set aside an exparte decree passed on 19.08.2014. The petitioner claims he was not informed about the proceedings due to multiple accidents in his family.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 3/2025
Case between Siddequl Akbar vs Muhammadali et al regarding injunction and mandatory relief.
The case involves Siddequl Akbar who is seeking permanent prohibitory injunctions against Muhammadali and others regarding a vehicle that was allegedly wrongfully taken from his possession. The suit also seeks mandatory relief for the return of the vehicle he purchased under an existing loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 35/2023
Case between GIREESAN vs SOOPY regarding restoration of a petition.
GIREESAN filed a petition against SOOPY under the Civil Procedure Code. The court allowed the restoration petition based on a proceeding from another court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 69/2021
Case between NAJEEB. K vs SOUDA et al regarding commission report and plan.
This case involves a petition filed by Najeev K against Souda and others regarding the remittance of a commission report and plan. The petitioner claims that the advocate commissioner failed to properly measure the plaint schedule property and requests a new commissioner to be appointed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 71/2021
Case between VALIYA PARAMBHATH MUHAMMAD KUTTY vs KEKKANDI KUNHABDULLA @ K. K. C. KUNHABDULLA MASTER regarding commission report.
The petitioner, VALIYA PARAMBHATH MUHAMMAD KUTTY, requested to remit back a commission report due to discrepancies in the property identification. The respondent, KEKKANDI KUNHABDULLA, objected, stating the petition was a delay tactic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 10/2023
Case between SASIDHARAN AMBALA PARAMBATH et al vs V. P. RAJAN et al regarding amendment of plaint and commission report
This case involves plaintiffs SASIDHARAN AMBALA PARAMBATH and DHANESH THALAPPOYIL seeking an amendment to the plaint concerning property and a commission report related to an easement by grant. The defendants include V. P. RAJAN and P. P. RANJITH, who are contesting the claims of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 13/2025
Case between KOLLAMPATIKKAL VASUDEVAN vs KUYYATIYILMOIDU regarding permanent injunction
KOLLAMPATIKKAL VASUDEVAN filed a suit against KUYYATIYILMOIDU for a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from blocking access to his property. The defendant is alleged to have no title to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 184/2023
Case between VALIYA PAINGENTAVIDA ASHRAF vs Dr. K. P. SETHUMADHAVAN regarding Execution Petition
VALIYA PAINGENTAVIDA ASHRAF filed an Execution Petition against Dr. K. P. SETHUMADHAVAN. The matter has been settled and the petition is not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 133/2017
Case between PONOTANTE PARAMBATH KUNHIKKANNAN vs PONOTANTE PARAMBATH MANNI et al regarding EP No. 80/2025
The case involves PONOTANTE PARAMBATH KUNHIKKANNAN as the petitioner and PONOTANTE PARAMBATH MANNI and others as respondents. It pertains to the Execution Petition EP No. 80/2025.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 64/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M et al regarding security for execution of decree.
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the plaintiff seeking security against AJEESH. K. M and VINEESH. O, the defendants. The case involves the attachment of property due to potential disposal by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 65/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M regarding security for a property attachment.
KERALA GRAMIN BANK filed a petition against AJEESH. K. M to secure property related to a decree. The court found a prima facie case for the petitioner and issued directives to the respondent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 60/2025
Case between P. V. SOORAJ vs P. V. KRISHNAVIDHYASAGAR et al regarding injunction
P. V. SOORAJ is the petitioner seeking an injunction against P. V. KRISHNAVIDHYASAGAR and P. KRISHNA LEKHA. The court granted an ad-interim injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 145/2019
Case between SUBAIDA et al vs MISIRIYA et al regarding restoration of dismissed petitions.
The case involves petitions for restoration of a dismissed application due to the first petitioner's medical issues. The petitioners seek to condone the delay caused by these circumstances.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 87/2022
Case between VALSALA ALLIYANKAL vs SHYLAJA. C. P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves VALSALA ALLIYANKAL and MANOJ ALLIYANKAL as petitioners/defendants against SHYLAJA. C. P as the respondent/plaintiff. The petition requests the court to set aside a commission report related to a dispute over a pathway and trespassing issues.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 91/2024
Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding Advocate commissioner appointment
Ramla is seeking the appointment of an Advocate commissioner to record her evidence as she is bedridden after surgery. Subair, the respondent, has objections based on family disputes and does not wish to enter her home.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 32/2025
Case between VALSARAJ RAMATH vs 1THAYYULLATHIL KARUNAN et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
VALSARAJ RAMATH is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who claim possession of the property in dispute. The plaintiff believes he is in possession based on the title deed and is seeking to amend the plaint to include a request for recovery of possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 35/2025
Case between SIVARAM vs ADIKUNIYIL NASEERA et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
Sivaram, the petitioner, is seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against him due to his absence in court. The respondents, including Naseera and Jaseela, oppose this request, stating the decree should stand since the execution has already been completed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 147/2022
Case between Baby Rajan et al vs Ashokan. M. P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
This case involves Baby Rajan and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Ashokan. M. P regarding their easement rights over a pathway. The parties are in dispute over the ownership and access rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 128/2021
Case between Anil V. P et al vs Devi. V. P regarding final decree of partition
The case involves a petition for passing a final decree in accordance with a preliminary decree regarding the partition of property among the petitioners and respondents. The court has heard the petition and decided on the division of property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 47/2025
Case between Sheeba vs Raveendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and for damages.
The case involves a dispute between Sheeba and Raveendran along with another party regarding the property boundaries and entry points related to plaint A, B, and C schedule properties. The petitioners/defendants are challenging the Advocate commissioner's report, saying it contains errors and does not accurately reflect their property access.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 69/2025
Case between SOLI JOSEPH vs SULAIMAN regarding injunction against trespass
Soli Joseph, the plaintiff, filed a petition seeking an injunction to prevent Sulaiman, the defendant, from trespassing on her properties. The court examined evidence regarding property boundaries and the defendant's rights.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 139/2024
Case between HAMEED HAJI KINARULLA PARAMBATH vs MUHAMMAD IQBAL CHETTYAM VEETTIL regarding the appointment of Advocate commissioner for property identification
Hameed Haji Kinarulla Parambath filed a petition seeking the appointment of an Advocate commissioner to identify the plaint schedule property. Muhammad Iqbal Chettyam Veettile raised objections regarding the plaintiff's possession and the identification of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 9/2024
Case between VAZHAYIL KUMARAN vs CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL et al regarding IA 24/2025
This case involves VAZHAYIL KUMARAN as the petitioner and CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL and CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AZEEZ as respondents. The court dismissed the petition after determining it was devoid of merit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 131/2024
Case between KARYATT RAMSHAD et al vs PUTHIYA KOYILOTH AMMAD HAJI regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves KARYATT RAMSHAD and others as defendants and PUTHIYA KOYILOTH AMMAD HAJI as the plaintiff. The defendants are accused of trespassing into the plaint schedule property and constructing a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 113/2022
Case between Ammad vs Shikha et al regarding production of documents
The petitioners, Ammad and Ayisha, dispute the identity and title of the plaint schedule property claimed by the plaintiffs, Shikha, Shilpa, Sarath Kumar, and K. T. K Khalid. The court reviewed the petition for the production of documents related to a prior case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 93/2024
Case between AREEKKAL ABDULLA vs RASHEED et al regarding injunction
AREEKKAL ABDULLA is the petitioner and has filed against RASHEED and others for an injunction. The court has granted an ad-interim injunction till the disposal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 121/2025
Case between Moidu Haji Paloli vs Mannambath Tharuveyi regarding injunction
This case involves Moidu Haji Paloli and Ramla Paloli as the plaintiffs and Mannambath Tharuveyi and Mannambath Ali as the defendants. The plaintiffs are seeking an injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 125/2022
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs PRAMOD KUMAR. K. C regarding execution petition.
The case involves KERALA GRAMIN BANK as the petitioner and PRAMOD KUMAR. K. C as the respondent regarding an execution petition. The matter has been settled and the execution petition was closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 130/2024
Case between UNNIKKORACHAM VEETTIL ABDULLA vs THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY et al regarding injunction restraining trespass.
The case involves UNNIKKORACHAM VEETTIL ABDULLA who has filed a suit for injunction against the Kerala Water Authority and others. The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and installing pipelines.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 175/2023
Case between ABOOBACKER vs MUNEERA regarding execution petition.
ABOOBACKER is the petitioner and decree holder in this case, while MUNEERA is the respondent and judgment debtor. The case pertains to an execution petition filed under the code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 29/2024
Case between KETTUNGAL EDAVATTAN HAMEED vs ABDULLA HAJI et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
KETTUNGAL EDAVATTAN HAMEED seeks a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against ABDULLA HAJI and Indus Towers Ltd. This case involves a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a mobile tower.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2023
Case between P. Leela vs P. Narayanan Nambiar regarding additional counter claim
The petitioner, P. Narayanan Nambiar, filed a petition to receive an additional counter claim after the trial had commenced. The plaintiff, P. Leela, objected to this petition, arguing that it was belated and not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 11/2016
Case between Kurunnanveettil Usman et al vs Kurunnanveettil Moideen et al regarding measurement and indexing of property.
The plaintiffs, Kurunnanveettil Usman and Safiya, filed a petition to address issues with the measurement and marking of properties as per previous court orders. The defendants, Kurunnanveettil Moideen et al, contest these claims, asserting that the commissioner has adequately marked the relevant properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 102/2023
Case between NANU vs POKKI @ DEVI et al regarding property delivery.
NANU filed a petition regarding the delivery of property. The respondents did not enter appearance, and the court addressed the matter accordingly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 120/2025
Case between Safiya Kuruvayil vs Sameer Kuruvayil et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Safiya Kuruvayil is the petitioner seeking an ad-interim injunction. The respondents, including Sameer Kuruvayil and others, did not enter appearance during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 72/2021
Case between KANIYOTH ABDUL RASAQ vs KANIYOTH SEENATH regarding setting aside exparte decree
KANIYOTH ABDUL RASAQ petitioned to set aside an exparte decree against him in a boundary dispute case with KANIYOTH SEENATH. The petitioner claims he was incapacitated by medical conditions at the time the decree was issued.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 107/2025
Case between B. P. Firdous vs Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD et al regarding injunction.
B. P. Firdous is the petitioner seeking an injunction against the Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD and others. The court has ordered both parties to maintain status quo regarding the matter in dispute until the suit is resolved.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 21/2025
Case between AMMAD HAJI vs KUNHAMI et al regarding injunction for property dispute
The plaintiff, Ammad Haji, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing on his property. The defendants have countered that the property does not exist as claimed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 47/2024
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji, allege that the defendants trespassed on their property and caused damage. The case seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS/1136/1953
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
This case involves the petitioners Thondarkulangara Korumbathi and others against the respondents Thondarkulangara Chekkon and others regarding a preliminary decree. The court issued its order on the date specified.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 72/2025
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves SYNDICATE BANK as the plaintiff against ADARSH. A. C and others as defendants concerning a civil suit. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won