Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 145/2019

Case between SUBAIDA et al vs MISIRIYA et al regarding restoration of dismissed petitions.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-12-18
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 month 11 days
Case Code No.
145
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves petitions for restoration of a dismissed application due to the first petitioner's medical issues. The petitioners seek to condone the delay caused by these circumstances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions RPIA 13/2025 and IA 1/2025 were dismissed due to lack of sufficient reasons and delay in restoration.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions RPIA 13/2025 and IA 1/2025 were dismissed due to lack of sufficient reasons and delay in restoration.
Key Reasoning:
The reasons stated to restore the petitions were found to be without any bonafides and insufficient.
Why Defendant Won:
The reasons stated to restore the petitions were found to be without any bonafides and insufficient.
Supporting Evidence
Thus, in the light of discussions the reasons stated to restore RPIA 16/2024 is without any bonafides and there is no sufficient explanation as to 222 days of delay.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RPIA 13/2025 and IA 1/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SUBAIDA
Party Age
53
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SAFIYA
Party Age
49
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SAHIDA
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MISIRIYA
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
PUTHIYOTTIL SUBAIDA
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical records related to the first petitioner's treatment.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E. V. Lijeesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arunkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to restore a Restoration Application which has been dismissed for default due to non-payment of batta.
Evidence:
In the result, RPIA 13/2025 and IA 1/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won