Case Summary
Chandran, the plaintiff, filed a petition against the Secretary of Nadapuram Grama Panchayath and other defendants. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner during the hearings.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was absent and did not provide representation.
The petitioner was absent and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was absent and did not provide representation.
The petitioner was absent and did not provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, Petition is dismissed for default due to the absence of petitioner.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- CHANDRAN
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SECRETARY
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- ASSISTANT ENGINEER
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AJEENDRAN ALAKKANDY
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SARANYA OVERSEER
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POOMALAVEETIL MOHANAN
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petition is dismissed for default due to the absence of petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence, Petition is dismissed for default due to the absence of petitioner.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024