Case Summary
The plaintiff, N. K. Chandran, filed a suit against multiple defendants including the Secretary of Nadapuram Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent for the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence during the hearing led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence during the hearing led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence during the hearing led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence during the hearing led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the plaintiff is not present today.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N. K. CHANDRAN
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SECRETARY, NADAPURAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PWD Road Section
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AJEENDRAN ALAKKANDI
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SARANYA ,OVESEER, PWD ROAD SECTION
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- POOMALAVEETTIL MOHANAN
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- Father’s name not known
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Jishine Babu. N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mohammed Niyas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Farhan Ibin Abdul Gafoor. A. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E. Sanil Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anjali. C. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff filed two IAs; one to remove the suit from the list and to appoint a Civil Engineer, which was dismissed.
Evidence:
IA 13/25 is dismissed and IA 12/25 is closed as highly belated. Since, the plaintiff is not present today. Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between N. K. Chandran vs SECRETARY, NADAPURAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between N. K. Chandran vs SECRETARY, NADAPURAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH regarding suit dismissal for default