Case Summary
N. P. Padmakumar and others are petitioners seeking to reopen evidence in a long-pending case against Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The petitiioners aimed to mark a photocopy of a plan and permit issued previously.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions to reopen the evidence were dismissed with costs.
Key Reasoning:
The petitions were dismissed as they were deemed belated and without bona fide intent.
The petitions were dismissed as they were deemed belated and without bona fide intent.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitions were dismissed as they were deemed belated and without bona fide intent.
The petitions were dismissed as they were deemed belated and without bona fide intent.
Supporting Evidence
The petitions are highly belated. The present petition is to mark a photocopy of a plan and permit, and the petitioners failed to explain the relevance of the document.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA 17/2025 and IA 18/2025 are dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- N. P. PADMAKUMAR
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- C. P. VIJAYAN
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K. T. RAVEENDRAN NAMBIAR
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- K. K. BINU
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KIZHAKKE NAMAH FATHIMA
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KASTHURIKUNI YOOSAF
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KASTHURIKUNI AZEEZ
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KASTHURIKUNI ASHARAF
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. M. Kurrikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. U.V. Pradeepan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vimesh. K. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petitions IA 17/2025 and IA 18/2025 are dismissed with costs.
Evidence:
In the result, IA 17/2025 and IA 18/2025 are dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2014