Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 151/2023

Case between REEJESH @ RIJEESH vs 1ASHOKAN et al regarding issuance of summons to the witness

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
Case Code No.
151
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Reejesh @ Rijeesh, who is the 4th defendant, filed a petition to issue summons for a witness. The court dismissed the petition on the grounds that it was belated and lacked necessary documentation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by the 4th defendant to issue summons for a witness. The court highlighted that the petition was belated and lacked essential documentation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by the 4th defendant to issue summons for a witness. The court highlighted that the petition was belated and lacked essential documentation.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed on the grounds of being belated and lacking necessary documentation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The petition is highly belated and is only to prolong the case. Therefore, filing the present petition to summon a witness to produce the documents is highly belated.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 11/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
1ASHOKAN
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. P. RAJAN
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RAVEENDRAN. E
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Adeeb Salah. V. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Divakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N. M. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Petition to issue summons to the witness and produce documents.
Evidence:
Therefore, the petition is without bonafides and is only to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won