Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 59/2025

Case between Shahida. T vs Jameela Abdul Nazar et al regarding injunction against forceful eviction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
Case Code No.
59
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Shahida. T is the petitioner seeking to be impleaded as the 2nd defendant in a suit for injunction filed against her husband. The court found that she lacks authority over the property in question.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition to implead Shahida. T as the 2nd defendant, finding that she had no authority over the property in question.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition to implead Shahida. T as the 2nd defendant, finding that she had no authority over the property in question.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that there was no necessity to implead Shahida. T as she was only a permissive occupant.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that there was no necessity to implead Shahida. T as she was only a permissive occupant.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has no dispute against the title deed of the plaintiff who is the respondent in this case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, IA is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela Abdul Nazar
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Poolakkantavida Shameer
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahida. T
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Latheef. V. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. Krishnakumar. K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Sri. M.V.P Abdul Majeed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Respondent
Advocate Name
Smt. Devika Suresh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
This is a petition to implead the petitioner as the 2nd defendant in the suit.
Evidence:
Hence, IA is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won