Case Summary
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the plaintiff seeking security against AJEESH. K. M and VINEESH. O, the defendants. The case involves the attachment of property due to potential disposal by the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of the petition schedule property
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendants to furnish security or show cause why they should not do so. A conditional attachment of the property was also directed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case demonstrating the defendants' intention to obstruct the execution of the decree.
The petitioner made out a prima facie case demonstrating the defendants' intention to obstruct the execution of the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case demonstrating the defendants' intention to obstruct the execution of the decree.
The petitioner made out a prima facie case demonstrating the defendants' intention to obstruct the execution of the decree.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case. I am also satisfied that respondents/defendants with the intention to obstruct or delay the execution of decree that is likely to be passed against them, is about to dispose of the property.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the respondents/defendants are directed to furnish security for Rupees.1,46,382/- (Rupees One lakh Forty Six Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty Two only) or to appear and to show cause why they should not furnish security.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- KERALA GRAMIN BANK
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AJEESH. K. M
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- VINEESH. O
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Amaya
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abdul Raoof. V. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Conditional attachment of the petition schedule property
Evidence:
In the meanwhile, there shall be a conditional attachment of the petition schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Directing the respondents to furnish security for Rupees 1,46,382/-
Evidence:
the respondents/defendants are directed to furnish security for Rupees.1,46,382/- (Rupees One lakh Forty Six Thousand Three Hundred and Eighty Two only) or to appear and to show cause why they should not furnish security.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025