Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 65/2025

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M regarding security for a property attachment.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Smt. Divya Natesan
Order Date
2025-05-20
Duration
Case Code No.
65
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KERALA GRAMIN BANK filed a petition against AJEESH. K. M to secure property related to a decree. The court found a prima facie case for the petitioner and issued directives to the respondent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the defendant to furnish security for a specified amount and conditionally attached property pending compliance.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of the petition schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the defendant to furnish security for a specified amount and conditionally attached property pending compliance.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case for security against potential disposition of property by the respondent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case for security against potential disposition of property by the respondent.
Supporting Evidence
Upon the perusal of affidavit, petition and other records, I am satisfied that the petitioner had made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the respondent/defendant is directed to furnish security for Rupees 61,343/- or to appear and to show cause why he should not furnish security.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AJEESH. K. M
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof. V. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Conditional attachment of the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
In the meanwhile, there shall be a conditional attachment of the petition schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Direction to furnish security for Rupees 61,343/- or to appear.
Evidence:
Hence the respondent/defendant is directed to furnish security for Rupees 61,343/- or to appear and to show cause why he should not furnish security.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs PRAMOD KUMAR. K. C regarding execution petition.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs AJEESH. K. M et al regarding security for execution of decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won