Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 60/2025

Case between P. V. SOORAJ vs P. V. KRISHNAVIDHYASAGAR et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Code No.
60
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P. V. SOORAJ is the petitioner seeking an injunction against P. V. KRISHNAVIDHYASAGAR and P. KRISHNA LEKHA. The court granted an ad-interim injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the petitioner until the disposal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction until the disposal of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the petitioner until the disposal of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Petitioner made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that petitioner has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P. V. SOORAJ
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. V. KRISHNAVIDHYASAGAR
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. KRISHNA LEKHA
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. Subramanyian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anju. M. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Bhavana. B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit.
Evidence:
Satisfied that petitioner has made out a prima facie case. Issuance of notice before granting injunction would defeat the purpose by delay. Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won