Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 72/2021

Case between KANIYOTH ABDUL RASAQ vs KANIYOTH SEENATH regarding setting aside exparte decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-09-24
Duration
approximately-4 years 1 day
Case Code No.
72
Case Closed
Wed, 09/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KANIYOTH ABDUL RASAQ petitioned to set aside an exparte decree against him in a boundary dispute case with KANIYOTH SEENATH. The petitioner claims he was incapacitated by medical conditions at the time the decree was issued.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioner to contest the case on merits upon payment of costs to the respondent. The petitioner must pay Rs. 7,000 to the respondent for the inconvenience caused.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed to contest case on merits upon payment of costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner to contest the case on merits upon payment of costs to the respondent. The petitioner must pay Rs. 7,000 to the respondent for the inconvenience caused.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner managed to explain absence on trial date due to medical conditions, even though not every day was explained.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, the period of 135 days in presenting the application for condoning the delay is somewhat explained by the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the petitioner is directed to effect the payment of costs of Rs.7,000 on or before 27.09.2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KANIYOTH SEENATH
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KANIYOTH ABDUL RASAQ
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Ali. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is allowed to contest the case on merits with conditions.
Evidence:
The petitioner is allowed to contest the case on merits however, on a payment of costs of Rs.7,000/- to the respondent for the inconvenience caused to the respondent.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is directed to pay costs within 3 days.
Evidence:
The petitioner is directed to pay the costs within a period of 3 days from the date of this order.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 09/23/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 09/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won