Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 113/2022

Case between Ammad vs Shikha et al regarding production of documents

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-17
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Code No.
113
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Ammad and Ayisha, dispute the identity and title of the plaint schedule property claimed by the plaintiffs, Shikha, Shilpa, Sarath Kumar, and K. T. K Khalid. The court reviewed the petition for the production of documents related to a prior case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners for the production of documents, stating that the relevant document is a public document held by the Sub Court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners for the production of documents, stating that the relevant document is a public document held by the Sub Court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed as the document in question is a public document held by the Sub Court, and the petitioners can seek it directly from there.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 10/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shikha
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shilpa
Party Age
39
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarath Kumar
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. T. K Khalid
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammad
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayisha
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Subramayian. C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. M. Previn
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Latheef. V. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition filed by the petitioners/defendants is dismissed.
Evidence:
In the result, IA 10/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 05/17/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won