Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 184/2023

Case between VALIYA PAINGENTAVIDA ASHRAF vs Dr. K. P. SETHUMADHAVAN regarding Execution Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
Case Code No.
184
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

VALIYA PAINGENTAVIDA ASHRAF filed an Execution Petition against Dr. K. P. SETHUMADHAVAN. The matter has been settled and the petition is not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court noted that the matter was settled and the Execution Petition was not pressed. Full Satisfaction was recorded and the Execution Petition was closed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court noted that the matter was settled and the Execution Petition was not pressed. Full Satisfaction was recorded and the Execution Petition was closed.
Key Reasoning:
Matter settled and the petition was not pressed.
Why Defendant Won:
Matter settled and the petition was not pressed.
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled and the petition was not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition filed under Order 37 Rule 38 of the Civil Procedure Code. Decree Holder represented. Matter settled. EP not pressed. Endorsed. Full Satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
VALIYA PAINGENTAVIDA ASHRAF
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. K. P. SETHUMADHAVAN
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ali. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won