Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 121/2025

Case between Moidu Haji Paloli vs Mannambath Tharuveyi regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-10-04
Duration
Case Code No.
121
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Moidu Haji Paloli and Ramla Paloli as the plaintiffs and Mannambath Tharuveyi and Mannambath Ali as the defendants. The plaintiffs are seeking an injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
An ad-interim injunction is granted to the plaintiffs until the disposal of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction until disposal of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
An ad-interim injunction is granted to the plaintiffs until the disposal of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Petitioner has made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that petitioner has made out a prima facie case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moidu Haji Paloli
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ramla Paloli
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mannambath Tharuveyi
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mannambath Ali
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and documents presented by plaintiffs.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N. M. Rajagopal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Adeeb Salah
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction granted until the disposal of the suit.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The affidavit was perused by the court to ascertain the merits of the case.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode district, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won