Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 35/2025

Case between SIVARAM vs ADIKUNIYIL NASEERA et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration
approximately-4 months
Case Code No.
35
Case Closed
Wed, 12/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sivaram, the petitioner, is seeking to set aside an exparte decree passed against him due to his absence in court. The respondents, including Naseera and Jaseela, oppose this request, stating the decree should stand since the execution has already been completed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petitions filed by Sivaram, as the execution of the decree had already been completed, rendering the petitions infructuous.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petitions filed by Sivaram, as the execution of the decree had already been completed, rendering the petitions infructuous.
Key Reasoning:
The execution of the decree has already been completed.
Why Defendant Won:
The execution of the decree has already been completed.
Supporting Evidence
Therefore, to be precise the present restoration petition has become infructous and has no purpose at all.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, RPIA 26/2025 and IA 1/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
ADIKUNIYIL NASEERA
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
EASAKUNIYIL JASEELA
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
EASAKUNIYIL JAMSEENA
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SIVARAM
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Rahul Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Siju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Muhammadali. E. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petitions RPIA 26/2025 and IA 1/2025 are dismissed with costs.
Evidence:
Hence, RPIA 26/2025 and IA 1/2025 is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Vatakara Taluk, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won