Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 10/2023

Case between SASIDHARAN AMBALA PARAMBATH et al vs V. P. RAJAN et al regarding amendment of plaint and commission report

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-01
Duration
Case Code No.
10
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves plaintiffs SASIDHARAN AMBALA PARAMBATH and DHANESH THALAPPOYIL seeking an amendment to the plaint concerning property and a commission report related to an easement by grant. The defendants include V. P. RAJAN and P. P. RANJITH, who are contesting the claims of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitions for amendment of the plaint and remittal of the commission report, aiming to clarify the issues at hand. The plaintiffs are directed to make necessary amendments within a specified period.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitions for amendment of the plaint and remittal of the commission report, aiming to clarify the issues at hand. The plaintiffs are directed to make necessary amendments within a specified period.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The proposed amendment will not change the nature of the suit and will clear the issue in dispute with the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA 15/2025 and IA 16/2025 is allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
SASIDHARAN AMBALA PARAMBATH
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
DHANESH THALAPPOYIL
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. P. RAJAN
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P. P. RANJITH
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KUNIYIL POKKAN
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. K. Anil Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. K. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arun Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are permitted to amend the plaint.
Evidence:
Therefore, the amendment application is allowed and plaintiffs/petitioners are directed to amend the plaint within a period of 14 days from the date of order.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The report and plan dated 07.10.2024 is remitted back to the same Advocate commissioner for filing the fresh report and plan.
Evidence:
The commissioner report and plan dated 07.10.2024 is remitted back to the same Advocate commissioner for filing the fresh report and plan.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won