Case Summary
B. P. Firdous is the petitioner seeking an injunction against the Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD and others. The court has ordered both parties to maintain status quo regarding the matter in dispute until the suit is resolved.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Status quo order until disposal of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has directed both parties to maintain status quo regarding the property in question until the case is resolved.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The urgency of the petition warranted the maintenance of status quo.
The urgency of the petition warranted the maintenance of status quo.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The urgency of the petition warranted the maintenance of status quo.
The urgency of the petition warranted the maintenance of status quo.
Supporting Evidence
The Advocate Commissioner has noted the kind of constructions effected by the defendants in plaint schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, considering the urgency sought an order of status quo is passed and both parties are directed to maintain status quo until the disposal of the suit.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- B. P. Firdous
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Assistant Engineer, PWD
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- URALUNKAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.R. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Prasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. M. Ramdas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An order of status quo is passed until the disposal of the suit.
Evidence:
Hence, considering the urgency sought an order of statusquo is passed and both parties are directed to maintain statusquo until the disposal of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court considered the commission report filed by the Advocate Commissioner which noted the constructions effected by the defendants.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2025