Case Summary
GIREESAN filed a petition against SOOPY under the Civil Procedure Code. The court allowed the restoration petition based on a proceeding from another court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition on payment of costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the execution petition as the restoration petition was allowed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the restoration petition had been allowed by the proceedings of the Munsiff Court.
The court found that the restoration petition had been allowed by the proceedings of the Munsiff Court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the restoration petition had been allowed by the proceedings of the Munsiff Court.
The court found that the restoration petition had been allowed by the proceedings of the Munsiff Court.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Debtor produced the daily proceeding of Munsiff Court, Koyilandy stating that Restoration Petition in OS 35/23 is allowed by that Court.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the EP cannot be proceeded with. EP is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- GIREESAN
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SOOPY
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Daily proceeding of Munsiff Court, Koyilandy.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. K. K. Lakshmi Bai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023