Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 292 OF 2017 — Case between Fousiya vs Raramkandath Usmankoya et al regarding realization of arrear of rent.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 63 OF 2016
Case between Puthooril Pocker Haji vs Mulamukkil Anil regarding eviction and damages for use and occupation
Puthooril Pocker Haji filed a suit against Mulamukkil Anil for eviction and recovery of damages for use and occupation of a rented room. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has not paid rent for 10 months and is causing damage to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 106 OF 2015
Case between Moideenkutty vs Ummer Farook regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of rent.
Moideenkutty, the plaintiff, is seeking a mandatory injunction against Ummer Farook, the defendant, for non-payment of rent and to vacate the property he has occupied. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has failed to pay rent since November 2013 and has a total arrear of Rs. 19,540.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 123 OF 2018
Case between Asokan vs Kunnathakath Abdurahman regarding realization of arrears of rent.
Asokan is the plaintiff who has let out shop rooms to Kunnathakath Abdurahman for conducting a business. Asokan is claiming arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 80,136 from Kunnathakath Abdurahman for non-payment of rent since 2010.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 42/2014
Case between Shakkeela vs Kavumpurath Muhammedali et al regarding property possession
Shakkeela filed a petition against Kavumpurath Muhammedali and Salmath seeking property delivery, but the case was dismissed due to non-availability of the petitioner at the time of property possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 44/2012
Case between Chenadan Kunharu Haji et al vs Variyathu Padmanabhan et al regarding delivery of property
Chenadan Kunharu Haji and others filed a petition seeking delivery of property from Variyathu Padmanabhan and another, but the court dismissed the petition due to the property being in possession of another individual.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 96/2014
Case between Subrahmanian vs Devaki et al regarding property delivery
Subrahmanian filed a petition for delivery of property against multiple judgment debtors. The court recorded the delivery of the property and closed the petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 126/2014
Case between Pidakkal Vasu vs Kuttiyil Balan regarding property delivery
Pidakkal Vasu filed a case against Kuttiyil Balan for property delivery. The court ordered the property to be delivered and the petition was closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 98/2014
Case between Pathummakutty vs Kunhipathumma et al regarding property delivery
Pathummakutty, the decree holder, filed a case against Kunhipathumma and Ali Haji seeking property delivery. The court ordered property delivery and closed the Execution Petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 93/2014
Case between Basheer et al vs Puthiyatha regarding property delivery
Plaintiffs, including Basheer, Abdul Shameer, and Mariyamu, filed a case against the defendant Puthiyatha U.P. Usman for property delivery. The court ordered delivery of the property, and the petition is closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 20/2015
Case between Hense Raj-P1 vs Gladis regarding property delivery
The case involves Hense Raj-P1 as the decree holder seeking property delivery from Gladis, the judgment debtor. The court ordered the property to be delivered and closed the petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 15/2015
Case between Sulaikhabi et al vs Nalakath Ahammed Shereef et al regarding property delivery
Decree holders filed a case seeking property delivery, but the petition was dismissed for default due to no steps taken for delivery.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 62/2015
Case between Hajeesh vs Paraparambil Narayanan et al regarding property delivery
Hajeesh filed a case against Paraparambil Narayanan and Haneesh Kumar for property delivery, and the court ordered the delivery of the property to the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 94 OF 2016
Case between Palakka Valappil Pelayam parambil Hamza @ Bava vs Kalleri Mohandas regarding recovery of possession
Palakka Valappil Pelayam parambil Hamza @ Bava, aged 85, filed a suit against Kalleri Mohandas, aged 50, for recovery of possession with arrears of rent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 358 OF 2014
Case between Koyakkutty vs Thottunkandi Avaran regarding eviction.
Koyakkutty filed a suit for eviction against Thottunkandi Avaran. The court dismissed the suit as per the statement filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 42 of 2012
Case between Adimaparambil Abdul Razaq vs Nedumparambil Abdul Latheef regarding eviction of defendant from the plaint schedule house.
Adimaparambil Abdul Razaq, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nedumparambil Abdul Latheef, the defendant, for eviction from a house that was let out on rent. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has not paid rent arrears and that he requires the house for personal use.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 222 OF 2016
Case between Bennet Joseph vs Jose Mannamparambil, Shinoj Mannamparambil regarding Eviction
Bennet Joseph filed a suit against Jose Mannamparambil and Shinoj Mannamparambil for eviction from the property. The defendants were alleged to be trespassers and failed to vacate despite claims from the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 373 OF 2017
Case between Hyder Haji vs Kurikkale kalathil Bava regarding Arrears of Rent and Damages.
Hyder Haji filed a suit against Kurikkale kalathil Bava for arrears of rent and damages after the defendant vacated the rented premises. The court found in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's failure to pay rent and damages.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 274 OF 2017
Case between Sunil vs Abdul Azees regarding eviction and compensation
Sunil filed a suit against Abdul Azees for eviction and compensation for wrongful use of a shop room. The court found in favor of Sunil as the defendant failed to vacate the premises despite multiple notices.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 522 OF 2013
Case between Cheruvalappil Abdu vs Cheruvalappil Hamzakutty regarding eviction.
Cheruvalappil Abdu filed a suit for eviction against Cheruvalappil Hamzakutty. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 166 OF 2018
Case between Palakkavalappil Sainaba et al vs Chelakkal Shamsudheen regarding eviction and damages
Palakkavalappil Sainaba and others are suing Chelakkal Shamsudheen for eviction and damages due to non-payment of license fees for shop rooms. The plaintiffs claim the defendant has failed to pay the agreed fees and has remained in unauthorized occupation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 159 OF 2019
Case between Enthu vs Mohamed Shafi regarding eviction, damages and rent arrears.
Enthu, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Mohamed Shafi, the defendant, for eviction, damages, and rent arrears. The case was set for hearing but the defendant was absent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 91 OF 2019
Case between Kanhirakkot Yoosuf vs Hafsath regarding Eviction and Arrears of Rent
The plaintiff, Kanhirakkot Yoosuf, is seeking eviction of the defendant, Hafsath, for non-payment of rent. The court found that the plaintiff has proven his case and is entitled to the relief sought.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 466 OF 2014
Case between Illathparambil Moidheenkutty's children vs Biyyakkutty Umma et al regarding eviction.
The plaintiffs, Illathparambil Moidheenkutty's children, filed a suit for eviction against the defendants, including Biyyakkutty Umma and Mariyamu. The court has allowed an interim application and directed both parties to appear before the Hon'ble Sub Court.
Civil Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 126 OF 2016
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Alikutty regarding realisation of money
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Alikutty for the recovery of a loan amount due. Alikutty had defaulted on a loan taken for agricultural activities and admitted the liability.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 194 OF 2016
Case between Canara Bank vs Mahesh.P. P regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank filed a suit against Mahesh.P. P for the recovery of an agricultural loan amounting to Rs. 60,493/- which was not repaid by the defendant. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayment and did not respond to the bank's demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2016
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, Shahul Hameed, claims that the defendant, Veerankutty, owes him Rs. 5,65,000 from a land transaction and has failed to repay it. The defendant contends that there was no land transaction and that he has repaid the amount borrowed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 140 OF 2018
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sailesh kumar regarding realisation of money
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Sailesh kumar for the recovery of loan amount due to non-payment. The defendant admitted the claim in the written statement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 130 OF 2018
Case between K.Abdul Latheef vs Riyas Yoosaf regarding money
K.Abdul Latheef has filed a suit against Riyas Yoosaf seeking monetary relief. The defendant did not appear in court, and the case was set ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 68 OF 2018
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Pamila.V.S. et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, Kerala Gramin Bank, filed a suit for the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants, Pamila.V.S. and V.P.Surendran, who defaulted on their educational loan payments. The defendants did not appear in court, leading to an ex parte judgment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 90 OF 2019
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Mehaboob et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves Kerala Gramin Bank as the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount due from the defendants Mehaboob and Unneen. The defendants failed to repay the loan, leading the bank to pursue legal action for the recovery of the amount owed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 15 OF 2019
Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Subair regarding money
M/s Bharathy Auto Finance filed a suit against Subair for money. The case was heard ex parte due to the absence of the defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 49 OF 2019
Case between Kakkuzhiyil Basheer vs Moideenkutty regarding arrears of rent
Kakkuzhiyil Basheer filed a suit against Moideenkutty for arrears of rent. The defendant did not appear in court and the plaintiff's evidence went unchallenged.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 285 OF 2018
Case between Kakkuzhiyil Basheer vs Cherookkara Musthafa regarding arrear of rent
Kakkuzhiyil Basheer is the plaintiff who has filed a suit against Cherookkara Musthafa for non-payment of rent. The defendant has not paid rent since June 2015 despite repeated demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 261 OF 2018
Case between Vijaya Bank, Tirur Branch vs Kadeeja regarding realization of money
Vijaya Bank is seeking to recover a loan amount from Kadeeja. The defendant defaulted on the loan repayments despite repeated demands from the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 34 OF 2019
Case between Vijaya Bank et al vs Subramanian.C. et al regarding money repayment
Vijaya Bank, represented by its Branch Manager, filed a suit against Subramanian.C. and Girija.C. regarding a money-related issue. The court dismissed the suit for not paying the necessary court fees.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 18 OF 2019
Case between Vijaya Bank, Rep. By its Branch Manager vs Peethambaran.T. regarding realization of money
Vijaya Bank filed a suit against Peethambaran.T. for the recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant had defaulted on loan repayments despite being given notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 4/2013
Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. filed a case against Musthafa resulting in a judgment on the decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 473/2012
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Thennala Service Co-op.Bank filed a case against Mohan, Pratheesh, and Ranjith seeking loan closure, which was closed by endorsement on the notice.
Civil Suit
EP 206/2012
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Four decree holders sued Muhammed Abdul Noor and obtained a judgment in their favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 14/2013
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
South Malabar Gramin Bank filed a case against K.Balakrishnan for decree transmission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2634/2012
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Petitioner Hamza filed a petition seeking a favorable decision, which was allowed on the condition of paying a cost of RS.1000, later paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2477/2012
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Petitioner Mullanmadakkal Mammi filed a petition on medical grounds, which was allowed with the condition of paying costs of Rs. 1000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 124/2012
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
The Secretary of Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. filed a case against multiple judgment debtors for debt recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 132/2012
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Hamza Haji as the decree holder claimed property delivery against Chakkalakkal Harif and Illikkal Khadeeja, resulting in property delivered and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2389/2012
Case between Thami et al vs Suresh Babu regarding an order to pay costs
Petition allowed on condition of paying cost of Rs.3000 by petitioner to respondent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2703/2012
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
A petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioner pays costs to the respondent by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 393/2012
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Unniveettil Vinesh filed a case against Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
EP 348/2011
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Decree holder Kunnathodi Sarada filed a case against several defendants for the delivery of property, which was ultimately granted by the court on 30-07-2013.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won