Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2016

Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-05-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Shahul Hameed, claims that the defendant, Veerankutty, owes him Rs. 5,65,000 from a land transaction and has failed to repay it. The defendant contends that there was no land transaction and that he has repaid the amount borrowed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that it has the territorial jurisdiction to hear the suit as a part of the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction. The suit is deemed maintainable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that it has the territorial jurisdiction to hear the suit as a part of the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction. The suit is deemed maintainable.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the suit is maintainable and has jurisdiction to try the case based on the cause of action.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court determined that the suit is maintainable and has jurisdiction to try the case based on the cause of action.
Supporting Evidence
To decide the question of territorial jurisdiction the whole of the pleading is to looked into.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find that the suit maintainable before this court.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahul Hameed
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veerankutty
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Mohammed Basil Koya Thangal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Pkaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 05/31/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaki vs Subrahmanyan regarding property delivery
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammedkutty et al vs Komukkutty regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won