Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2016

Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-05-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Shahul Hameed, claims that the defendant, Veerankutty, owes him Rs. 5,65,000 from a land transaction and has failed to repay it. The defendant contends that there was no land transaction and that he has repaid the amount borrowed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found that it has the territorial jurisdiction to hear the suit as a part of the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction. The suit is deemed maintainable.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court determined that the suit is maintainable and has jurisdiction to try the case based on the cause of action.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence I find that the suit maintainable before this court.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Shahul Hameed (41 years) Athiyathil House, Thrikkandiyur amsom, Kumaramangalam desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Veerankutty (55 years) Palattu Tharayil (H), Easwaramangalam amsom, Puzhambram desom, P.O.Buyyam, Ponnani Taluk. PIN 679 576.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases