Case Summary
Decree holders sought property delivery, which was granted and recorded by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property Delivery
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of property, which was duly recorded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. Petition is closed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammedkutty
- Party Age
- 63
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kannamkadavath Safiya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Komukkutty
- Party Age
- 51
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Komukkutty
- Appearance Type
- Unknown
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Court ordered the delivery of the property.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Delivery recorded. Petition is closed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2014