Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No. 363 OF 2016 — Case between Shahul Hameed vs Veerankutty regarding realisation of money.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
EP 132/2012
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Hamza Haji as the decree holder claimed property delivery against Chakkalakkal Harif and Illikkal Khadeeja, resulting in property delivered and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 393/2012
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Unniveettil Vinesh filed a case against Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
EP 348/2011
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Decree holder Kunnathodi Sarada filed a case against several defendants for the delivery of property, which was ultimately granted by the court on 30-07-2013.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 56/2014
Case between Devaki vs Subrahmanyan regarding property delivery
Devaki, the decree holder, filed a petition against Subrahmanyan, the judgment debtor, for the delivery of property. The court ordered for the property to be delivered and recorded the same.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 127/2014
Case between Muhammedkutty et al vs Komukkutty regarding property delivery
Decree holders sought property delivery, which was granted and recorded by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 301/2013
Case between Mandalaparambil Jayakumar vs Naduthodi Lakshmi regarding decree set aside
The court case was filed by Mandalaparambil Jayakumar against Naduthodi Lakshmi to set aside a decree dated 23-10-13.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 488/2012
Case between Chanakka Parambil Fathima Beevi vs Kollarikkal Abdul Rasheed regarding property delivery
Chanakka Parambil Fathima Beevi filed a case against Kollarikkal Abdul Rasheed for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 402/2012
Case between Prakasan et al vs Sreedharan et al regarding property delivery
Prakasan and Babu filed a case against Sreedharan, Devayani, Kamalakshi, Velu, Vasu, Visalakshi, Santha, Suseela, Dasan, Sasidharan, Thankamani, Chathru, Kunhammu, Rajagopalan, Vijayalakshmi, Balakrishnan, Kamalakshi, Sukumaran, Surendran, Sunitha, Saritha, Sarath Babu regarding delivery of property.
Civil Suit
EP 210/2014
Case between Nazeema Karikulakkat vs Manager regarding property possession
Nazeema Karikulakkat filed a petition seeking possession of a property, but the petition was dismissed for default as she was not present when the Amin visited the property for delivery.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 466/2012
Case between Kainikkara Muhammedkutty vs Thachaparambil Kunhimuhammed regarding vacant possession
Kainikkara Muhammedkutty filed a case against Thachaparambil Kunhimuhammed seeking vacant possession of the petition schedule property, and the court recorded satisfaction of the order upon petitioner obtaining vacant possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
FDA 1075/2012
Case between Latheef et al vs Majeed et al regarding property rights
Petitioners filed a case against respondents regarding property rights. The court remitted documents to the commissioner for a report on defects.
Civil Suit
Original Suit No. 56 OF 2015
Case between Abdul Rahman vs Muhammed Kutty regarding partition
Abdul Rahman filed a petition for a final decree for partition of property against Muhammed Kutty. The preliminary decree for partition was passed on 20.01.2017, and the case involves the division of shares in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 6/2017
Case between Sulochana et al vs Chandran regarding property delivery
The case involved the Decree Holders seeking property delivery from the Judgment Debtor Chandran, which was delivered as per the court order.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 77 OF 2014
Case between Variyam parambil Abu vs Variyam parambil Jamal et al regarding specific performance and partition
The case involves Variyam parambil Abu, the plaintiff, seeking specific performance of an agreement and partition of inherited property after the death of Moideen, their father. The defendants, Variyam parambil Jamal and Variyam parambil Kadeeja, contested the agreement and asserted their ownership of their shares.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 135 OF 2016
Case between Saffiya. A et al vs Saifudheen et al regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiffs, led by Saffiya. A, claim absolute ownership and possession of a property they inherited from their predecessor, Palappetty Mohamedkutty. They seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants, who contest the plaintiffs' ownership and have allegedly obstructed their enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 25/2017
Case between Fathima vs Enikutty regarding property delivery
Fathima filed a case against Enikutty for property delivery, which was decided in favor of Fathima, resulting in the property being delivered.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.251 OF 2014
Case between K.P.Mohamed Haneefa vs Mohammed Khasim regarding return of advance amount
Plaintiff seeks return of advance amount paid for purchase of property from defendant due to failure to perform agreement. Defendant denies agreement execution and asserts payment was for partnership business.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 273 OF 2015
Case between Sajeev vs Kaliyammu, Mukesh, Sasikala regarding partition of property
Sajeev, the petitioner and plaintiff, filed a suit for partition and separate allotment of his share in a property. The court ordered a final decree for partition after considering the Advocate Commissioner's report.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 176/2017
Case between Kuttan vs Bindu et al regarding property delivery
Kuttan filed EP against Bindu and others seeking property delivery, which was granted by the court and recorded.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 192/2017
Case between Sasidharan vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery
Sasidharan filed a case against Meenakshi and multiple others for property delivery, which was successfully delivered and recorded.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 191/2017
Case between Saraswathy vs Meenakshi et al regarding property delivery
Saraswathy filed a case against Meenakshi and others seeking property delivery, which was granted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 194/2017
Case between Meenakshi vs Karunakaran et al regarding property delivery
Meenakshi, the decree holder, filed a case against Karunakaran and multiple judgment debtors regarding property delivery, which was resolved with property delivery recorded and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP/145/2017
Case between Puravalappil Mohanan vs Puravalappil Krishnan regarding property delivery
Case filed by Puravalappil Mohanan against Puravalappil Krishnan for property delivery resulted in the property being delivered and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 199/2014
Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Sidheeq regarding property dispute
The Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. filed a case against Sidheeq regarding a property, which was later closed as the property was already sold.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
EP 174/2016
Case between Madhavi et al vs Nambeeri et al regarding delivery of property
Madhavi and others filed a case against Nambeeri and others seeking delivery of property, resulting in the closure of EP.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 28/2018
Case between Vilissery Hamsa vs Muthamparambil Nadesh et al regarding decree transfer
Case involving decree holder Vilissery Hamsa and judgment debtors Muthamparambil Nadesh and Muthamparambil Nidesh regarding the transfer of decree to MC Parappangadi.
Civil Suit
EP 44/2018
Case between Iyyathumma vs Saidalikutty et al regarding property delivery
A case filed by Iyyathumma against Saidalikutty and others resulted in the delivery of property as per the court order.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 175/2017
Case between Puravalappil Appu vs Mohanan regarding property delivery
The case involves a matter related to property delivery, where the Decree Holder filed a case against the Judgment Debtor Mohanan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 206/2016
Case between Kalathil Kandamparambil Sulaikha vs Hamsa et al regarding property delivery
Kalathil Kandamparambil Sulaikha filed a case against multiple parties seeking property delivery, which was granted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 149/2018
Case between Vijayan vs Mannam Parambil Damodharan Chettiyar regarding property delivery
Vijayan filed a case against Mannam Parambil Damodharan Chettiyar regarding the delivery of property resulting in the EP being closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 274 OF 2015
Case between Amalath Velayudhan vs Veluthedath Valappil Ravi et al regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Amalath Velayudhan filed a suit against Veluthedath Valappil Ravi and others regarding the ownership and possession of a property, alleging fraud and trespassing.
Civil Suit
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 13 OF 2016
Case between Koonathil Pathummu Umma et al vs Thanikkatt Muhammed et al regarding injunction and compensation
Koonathil Pathummu Umma and Thanikkatt Muhammedali are plaintiffs claiming that their basement was unlawfully demolished by the defendants including the Triprangode Grama Panchayat and its Secretary. The defendants argue that the plaintiffs encroached onto public property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 441/2014
Case between Nalukandathil Musthafa, Nalukandathil Ismail vs Nalukandathil Noushad regarding partition and separate allotment of share
The case involves Nalukandathil Musthafa and Nalukandathil Ismail, the plaintiffs, seeking a final decree for partition of property against Nalukandathil Noushad, the defendant. A preliminary decree had previously been established for partitioning the property into three shares.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 65 OF 2014
Case between Parathoduvil Aboobacker vs Parathoduvil Kunhimuhammed's children regarding partition of property
The petitioner, Parathoduvil Aboobacker, seeks a final decree for partition of property following a preliminary decree. The respondents opted to remain ex-parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 64 of 2013
Case between Kandamchira Yahu's children vs Kandamchira Yahu's children regarding partition
The petitioners, children of Kandamchira Yahu, filed a petition for final decree for partition of property following a preliminary decree. The case involves the division of property into shares among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 25 OF 2016
Case between Chedayan Thema Amma's children vs Parameswaran regarding partition of property.
The plaintiffs, Chedayan Thema Amma's children, are seeking a partition of the property originally owned by their parents. The defendant, Parameswaran, is refusing to divide the property despite being approached by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2014
Case between Balakrishnan vs Moideenkoya regarding Recovery of Possession
Balakrishnan, a deaf and dumb person, claimed that Moideenkoya illegally took possession of a business bunk that he was supposed to manage. The plaintiff sought recovery of possession after multiple failed attempts to reclaim it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 32 OF 2019
Case between Kelathil Thajudheen et al vs Salahudheen Kelathil regarding Partition
The case involves Kelathil Thajudheen and Kelathil Safiya as plaintiffs against Salahudheen Kelathil regarding a partition of property that belonged to their mother. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to a decision in favor of the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 193 OF 2015
Case between Jemsheena vs Raheem et al regarding injunction
Jemsheena filed a suit seeking an injunction against Raheem and others who allegedly obstructed her access to a way leading to her property. The defendants contended that no such way existed and sought to dismiss the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 181 OF 2013
Case between Sulaika vs Ashraf et al regarding partition of property
Sulaika, the petitioner and plaintiff, filed for partition and separate allotment of her share in the property. The case involves the respondents who are Mannenkara Mohamed's children.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 368 OF 2015
Case between Radha Amma et al vs Radhakrishnan regarding Partition
The case involves Radha Amma's legal heirs and Radhakrishnan regarding the partition of property originally belonging to Kollekkat Ammu Amma. The plaintiffs seek a decree for partition of the property, claiming a new house constructed with the defendant's permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 189 OF 2013
Case between Nambyarath Pocker's Children vs Thengayyith Abdul Salam's children regarding partition of property
The petitioners are the children of Nambyarath Pocker seeking a partition of property. The respondents are the children of Thengayyith Abdul Salam. The court granted a final decree for partition of the property after considering the Advocate Commissioner's report.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 110 OF 2012
Case between Muhammed et al vs Chatheri Kunheenkutty's children regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition of property following a preliminary decree. The original petitioner Muhammed died before the final hearing, and his legal heirs continued the application for a final decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 303 OF 2017
Case between Parappurath Hassan's children vs Thayyil Pothanarakkal Sabeela et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, children of Parappurath Hassan, seek a partition of property inherited from their deceased mother, Kadiyamu, against the defendants, including Thayyil Pothanarakkal Sabeela and her minor children. The case involves the settlement of property shares after it was found that the parties could agree on a compromise.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 298 OF 2015
Case between Pulikkalakath Aboobacker's children vs Naduparambil Muhammed Ali regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, children of Pulikkalakath Aboobacker, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Naduparambil Muhammed Ali, regarding a shop room they claim possession of. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant incorrectly asserts a right to occupy the shop room, which they have renovated for a new business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 169 OF 2018
Case between Chakkaliparambil Koya's children vs Musthafa regarding partition
Chakkaliparambil Koya's children are seeking a partition of the property originally belonging to their father, Chakkaliparambil Koya. The defendant Musthafa has opted to remain exparte in this suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 253 OF 2017
Case between Amina vs Thanneer Panthalil Saidalavi's children regarding partition
Amina filed a suit for partition of properties originally belonging to her deceased husband, Saidalavi. The case reached a settlement between the parties and was decreed accordingly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 130 OF 2015
Case between Palakkalakath Moosakutty vs Saleem et al regarding fixation of boundary and mandatory injunction.
The case involves Palakkalakath Moosakutty as the plaintiff and defendants Saleem and Sainudheen. The suit is about fixing the boundary of the plaintiff's property, alleging that the defendants constructed a compound wall encroaching upon the plaintiff's access way.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won