Case Summary
Meenakshi, the decree holder, filed a case against Karunakaran and multiple judgment debtors regarding property delivery, which was resolved with property delivery recorded and EP closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivery
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The property was delivered with recorded delivery, and the EP was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Meenakshi
- Party Age
- 69
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karunakaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chinnammu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narayani
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subrhmanyan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saraswathy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sasidharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulogana
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suneesh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujith
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumitha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sujitha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- GOPIKADAVATH
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Property Delivery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Property delivered and recorded
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2017