EP 206/2016

Case between Kalathil Kandamparambil Sulaikha vs Hamsa et al regarding property delivery

Court

Court of the Munsiff Magistrate

Judge

Smt. Vincy. T.V

Order Date

2018-06-07

Duration

1 year, 9 months, 7 days

Case Code No.

206

Case Closed

Thu, 06/07/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kalathil Kandamparambil Sulaikha filed a case against multiple parties seeking property delivery, which was granted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Property delivery

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Property delivered and recorded. Execution petition (EP) closed.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Property delivered. Delivery recorded. EP is closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kalathil Kandamparambil Sulaikha
Party Age: 40

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Hamsa
Relation: Judgment Debtor

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Muhammed
Party Age: 52

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Pathummu
Party Age: 48

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Razak
Party Age: 40

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Saithalikutty
Party Age: 46

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Manal Parambil Asya
Party Age: 50

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jamsheer
Party Age: 31

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jasir
Party Age: 29

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jilsar
Party Age: 26

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jaseera
Party Age: 21

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Adovocate
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Property Delivery

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Seeking delivery of the property.

Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification