Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 32 OF 2019

Case between Kelathil Thajudheen et al vs Salahudheen Kelathil regarding Partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt.SUSHAMA.P.
Order Date
2019-05-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kelathil Thajudheen and Kelathil Safiya as plaintiffs against Salahudheen Kelathil regarding a partition of property that belonged to their mother. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to a decision in favor of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the plaintiff's claims and issued a preliminary decree for partition of the property into two equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the plaintiffs to be the legal heirs of the deceased owner and confirmed their right to partition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result preliminary decree is passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule property shall be divided into 2 (two) equal shares by metes and bounds. 2. Plaintiff is entitled to get half share of Plaint B schedule property. 3. Defendant is entitled to get half share of plaint B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Kelathil Thajudheen (57 years years) Cheriyamundam amsom Thalakkadathur desom, Tirur Taluk. Kelathil Safiya (42 years years) Cheriyamundam amsom Thalakkadathur desom, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

Salahudheen Kelathil (60 years years) Cheriyamundam amsom Thalakkadathur desom, Tirur Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaint schedule property shall be divided into 2 equal shares.
Evidence:
In the result preliminary decree is passed as follows: The plaint schedule property shall be divided into 2 (two) equal shares by metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to half share of Plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to get half share of Plaint B schedule property.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is entitled to half share of plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendant is entitled to get half share of plaint B schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Jenm Assignment Deed evidencing ownership of the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Jenm Assignment Deed further supporting the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of lawyer notice demanding partition which was not replied to by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases