Case Summary
The case involves a partition of property following a preliminary decree. The original petitioner Muhammed died before the final hearing, and his legal heirs continued the application for a final decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition of property
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner reported a division of property in accordance with the preliminary decree.
The Advocate Commissioner reported a division of property in accordance with the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows: i. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 3 (Three) equal shares by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Aayisa (44 years)
Chatheri House, Kanmanam amsom, desom, Thekkumuri PO, Tirur
Faseela (16 years)
Chatheri House, Kanmanam amsom, desom, Thekkumuri PO, Tirur
Shibila Sherin (14 years)
Chatheri House, Kanmanam amsom, desom, Thekkumuri PO, Tirur
Defendants
Uneenkutty (Age not specified years)
Kanmanam amsom, desom, Thekkumuri PO, Tirur Taluk
Koya (Age not specified years)
Kanmanam amsom, desom, Thekkumuri PO, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition is passed as per the preliminary decree.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows:- i. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 3 (Three) equal shares by metes and bounds.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the Advocate Commissioner's report for the division of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the Advocate Commissioner's plan for the division of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2