Case Summary
The petitioner, Parathoduvil Aboobacker, seeks a final decree for partition of property following a preliminary decree. The respondents opted to remain ex-parte.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition granted with specific allotments of property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property as per the preliminary decree.
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property as per the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed and a final decree for partition is passed as follows: (I) Property having an extent of 14.47 cents shown as plot No. AB and D in Ext. C2 sketch is alloted to the 7/9 shares of the petitioner/plaintiff, in the decree schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Parathoduvil Aboobacker (52 years years)
Naduvattom Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Abdul Khader (49 years years)
Abdul Samad(insane) (41 years years)
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition of the property was allowed.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed and a final decree for partition is passed as follows
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioner shall pay an amount towards equalization of shares.
Evidence:
Petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs. 33.40/- to 2ⁿᵈ respondent towards the equalization of shares.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner's Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commissioner's report accepted for partitioning the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Plan for the partition of property in accordance with the commissioner's report.
Reference:
Ext.C2