Case Summary
Nazeema Karikulakkat filed a petition seeking possession of a property, but the petition was dismissed for default as she was not present when the Amin visited the property for delivery.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking possession of the property was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Nazeema Karikulakkat
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- Decree Holder
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manager
- Relation
- Judgment Debtor
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Manager
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Applicable
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Petition for property possession dismissed for default.
Evidence:
The petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2014