Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDA 1075/2012

Case between Latheef et al vs Majeed et al regarding property rights

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Biju. V.G
Order Date
2015-07-13
Duration
3 years, 3 months, 1 day
Case Code No.
1075
Case Closed
Mon, 07/13/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners filed a case against respondents regarding property rights. The court remitted documents to the commissioner for a report on defects.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court remitted documents to the commissioner for curing defects in the sketch and report.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court remitted documents to the commissioner for curing defects in the sketch and report.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

CR and sketch dated, 16-8-14 is remitted to the commissioner for filing report and sketch after curing the defects.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Latheef
Party Age
43
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Kasim
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sameer
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shamsudheen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bushra
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saheera
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aminakutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Majeed
Party Age
47
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Entheenkutty
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdulla
Party Age
56
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kader
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathimma
Party Age
51
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ayoob
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumayya
Party Age
27
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aboobacker
Party Age
58
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kadeeja Umma-insane
Party Age
72
Relation
Represented by brother Entheenkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Document remitted to commissioner for curing defects
Evidence:
CR and sketch dated, 16-8-14 is remitted to the commissioner for filing report and sketch after curing the defects.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2012

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/13/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/13/2015 - 12:00
From
Wed, 07/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
0%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaki vs Subrahmanyan regarding property delivery
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammedkutty et al vs Komukkutty regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won