ORIGINAL SUIT No.251 OF 2014

Case between K.P.Mohamed Haneefa vs Mohammed Khasim regarding return of advance amount

Court

Court of the Munsiff of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2017-09-14

Duration

3 years

Case Closed

Thu, 09/14/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff seeks return of advance amount paid for purchase of property from defendant due to failure to perform agreement. Defendant denies agreement execution and asserts payment was for partnership business.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit for the return of the advance amount paid by the plaintiff was dismissed by the court due to lack of evidence proving the agreement for the property sale and establishment of partnership business dealings.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Not mentioned

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Hence the suit is not entitled for any relief as claimed.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed. Hence the plaint is not entitled for any relief as claimed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: K.P.Mohamed Haneefa
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o Kunhan Bava

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mohammed Khasim
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o Abdul Kadar

Plaintiffs Documents

Ext.A1 - Sale agreement dated 20-08-2010

Defendants Documents

B1 to B6 - Receipts from Tirur Arban Co-Operative Bank, Pariyapuram Branch

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided

Outcome:

Description:

Return of advance amount

Evidence:

Not mentioned

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Used as evidence for the agreement for sale of the property

Reference:

Ext.A1

Document Type: Receipts

Submitted By: Defendant