Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 56 OF 2015

Case between Abdul Rahman vs Muhammed Kutty regarding partition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. Jankish Narayanan
Order Date
2019-08-31
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Rahman filed a petition for a final decree for partition of property against Muhammed Kutty. The preliminary decree for partition was passed on 20.01.2017, and the case involves the division of shares in the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition by Abdul Rahman for final decree for partition is allowed. The property is to be divided into two equal shares, with specific plots allocated to each party.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property in accordance with the preliminary decree.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows:- i. The decree schedule property shall be divided into 2 (Two) equal shares by metes and bounds.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Abdul Rahman (48 years years) Veloor House, Thozhuvannur amsom, desom and Post, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Muhammed Kutty (45 years years) Velloor house, Thozhuvannur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition allowing the petitioner to possess the allotted share of the property.
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows:- i. The decree schedule property shall be divided into 2 (Two) equal shares by metes and bounds.
Relief Type: Payment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petitioner is ordered to pay Rs. 450/- to the respondent towards equalisation of shares.
Evidence:
The petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs. 450/- to the respondent, towards equalisation of shares.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commissioner Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The report filed by the Advocate Commissioner detailing the division of property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The plan filed by the Advocate Commissioner showing the allotment of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases