Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 77 OF 2014

Case between Variyam parambil Abu vs Variyam parambil Jamal et al regarding specific performance and partition

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-15
Duration
2 years 4 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Variyam parambil Abu, the plaintiff, seeking specific performance of an agreement and partition of inherited property after the death of Moideen, their father. The defendants, Variyam parambil Jamal and Variyam parambil Kadeeja, contested the agreement and asserted their ownership of their shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to receive 2/16 shares of the property, while the second defendant will receive the remaining 14/16 shares. The second defendant is required to execute a sale deed in favor of the plaintiff within two months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Execution of sale deed with respect to 2/16 share in favour of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to receive 2/16 shares of the property, while the second defendant will receive the remaining 14/16 shares. The second defendant is required to execute a sale deed in favor of the plaintiff within two months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff had established readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and the suit was maintainable despite the defendant's claims of limitation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the execution of Ext.A2 document was proved and that there was no sufficient evidence to support the claims of the first defendant, establishing the plaintiff's right to the shares.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to have 2/16 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property. 2. The second defendant is entitled to get 14/16 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property. 3. The second defendant has to execute sale deed with respect to 2/16 share in favour of the plaintiff within two months from the date of the final decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Variyam parambil Abu
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Variyam parambil Jamal
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Variyam parambil Kadeeja
Party Age
66
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Kanam Assignment Deed No.03-11-1977, Sale Agreement No.29-09-2008.
Defendants Documents
Joint Release deed No.3942/2013

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Dinesh Pookayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P. Sreehari
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Vivek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Specific Performance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree for specific performance of the sale agreement.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the property of 1st party to be transferred in his name.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The parties are entitled to their respective shares in the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
The total extend of the Plaint B schedule property is 6 1/2 cents. The plaintiff is entitled to have 2/16 shares in the plaint 'B' schedule property.
Relief Type: Execution of Sale Deed
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The second defendant is ordered to execute the sale deed in favor of the plaintiff within two months.
Evidence:
The second defendant has to execute sale deed with respect to 2/16 share in favour of the plaintiff within two months from the date of the final decree.
Relief Type: Execution through Court
Outcome: Granted
Description:
In case of failure to execute the sale deed, the plaintiff can have it executed through the court.
Evidence:
In case the second defendant failed to execute the sale deed within two months from the date of passing final decree the plaintiff is allowed to get the document executed through court.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the basis for the plaintiff's claim for specific performance of the contract.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Kanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides context regarding the genealogical ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Joint Release Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document evidences the transfer of share from other heirs in favor of the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Specific performance of contract
Case Code
Case between Variyam parambil Abu vs Variyam parambil Jamal et al regarding specific performance and partition
Case Code Year
Case between Variyam parambil Abu vs Variyam parambil Jamal et al regarding specific performance and partition

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 02/22/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Devaki vs Subrahmanyan regarding property delivery
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhammedkutty et al vs Komukkutty regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won