Original Suit No. 181 OF 2013

Case between Sulaika vs Ashraf et al regarding partition of property

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN

Order Date

2019-07-17

Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sulaika, the petitioner and plaintiff, filed for partition and separate allotment of her share in the property. The case involves the respondents who are Mannenkara Mohamed's children.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The petition for partition of property was allowed, and a final decree for partition was passed. The properties were allotted to the parties as per the Advocate Commissioner's report.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner effected division of property in an equitable manner in tune with the preliminary decree.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows: i. The plaint B schedule properties shall be divided into 480 equal shares by metes and bounds. ii. Property shown as 'FBKHG' in Ext.C2 Plan is allotted to the share of the petitioner. iii. Property shown as 'ABCD' in Ext.C2 Plan is allotted to the share of the 1st respondent. iv. Property shown as 'ECDF' in the Ext.C2 Plan is allotted to the second respondent. v. Property shown as 'GHIJ' in Ext.C2 Plan is allotted to the third respondent.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Sulaika (55 Years years) Mandepurath, Kottakkal amsom, desom, PO. Kottakkal, Tirurangadi Taluk

Defendants

Ashraf (Age not specified years) Thenayi Paramba, Athavanad amsom, desom, PO. Athavanad, Tirur Taluk Basheer (Age not specified years) Thenayi Paramba, Athavanad amsom, desom, PO. Athavanad, Tirur Taluk Fathima Beevi (Age not specified years) Thenayi Paramba, Athavanad amsom, desom, PO. Athavanad, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Final decree for partition is passed, allotting specific properties to each party.

Evidence:

the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows:- i.The plaint B schedule properties shall be divided into 480 equal shares by metes and bounds.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

This document contains the Advocate Commissioner's report regarding the partition of property.

Reference:

Ext.C1

Document Type: Commission Plan